• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过荧光共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察不同草药冲洗剂作为终末冲洗液对粪肠球菌黏附的影响。

Influence of various herbal irrigants as a final rinse on the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis by fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscope.

作者信息

Rosaline Hannah, Kandaswamy D, Gogulnath D, Rubin Mi

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):352-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.114365.

DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.114365
PMID:23956540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3740649/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the antibacterial efficacy of three different herbal irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single rooted teeth were extracted due to orthodontic and periodontal reasons. The teeth were then inoculated with E. faecalis. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups and two control groups of six samples each. Group 1 specimens were treated with 5.2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCL) for 30 min followed by 5 mmol/L Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 5 min and saline as final irrigant. Group 2 specimens were treated with and 5.2% NaOCl for 30 min as final irrigant. Group 3 were treated with Morinda citrifolia (MC) for 30 min as final irrigant. Group 4 were treated with Azadiracta indica (AI) as final irrigant. Group 5 were treated with green tea (GT) for 30 min as final irrigant. The dentin specimens were carefully spread onto a microscope slide and stained with BacLight and examined in a confocal laser scanning microscope set to monitor fluorescein isothiocyanate and propidium iodide. A total of nine fields were examined for each treatment and the bacteria presented were counted.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Using the one-way ANOVA with multiple comparison, significantly less bacteria were found adhering to the samples treated with Neem followed by NaOCL, GT, MC, Saline.

RESULTS

AI treatment produced the maximum reduction in adherence of E. faecalis to dentin (9.30%) followed by NaOCl (12.50%), GT (27.30%), MC (44.20%) and saline (86.70%).

CONCLUSION

Neem is effective in preventing adhesion of E. faecalis to dentin.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估三种不同的草药冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果。

材料与方法

因正畸和牙周原因拔除单根牙。然后将牙齿接种粪肠球菌。将牙齿随机分为三个实验组和两个对照组,每组六个样本。第1组样本先用5.2%次氯酸钠(NaOCL)处理30分钟,再用5 mmol/L乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)处理5分钟,最后用生理盐水冲洗。第2组样本用5.2% NaOCl处理30分钟作为最终冲洗剂。第3组用巴戟天(MC)处理30分钟作为最终冲洗剂。第4组用印楝(AI)作为最终冲洗剂。第5组用绿茶(GT)处理30分钟作为最终冲洗剂。将牙本质样本小心地铺在显微镜载玻片上,用BacLight染色,并在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜下检查,以监测异硫氰酸荧光素和碘化丙啶。每种处理共检查九个视野,并对出现的细菌进行计数。

统计分析

采用单因素方差分析和多重比较,发现用印楝处理的样本上附着的细菌明显少于用NaOCL、GT、MC、生理盐水处理的样本。

结果

AI处理使粪肠球菌在牙本质上的附着减少最多(9.30%),其次是NaOCl(12.50%)、GT(27.30%)、MC(44.20%)和生理盐水(86.70%)。

结论

印楝能有效防止粪肠球菌附着于牙本质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/b820150c5a28/JCD-16-352-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/8d187003a090/JCD-16-352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/33a3b6603b54/JCD-16-352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/bd06486e3c7a/JCD-16-352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/f0324dcc37db/JCD-16-352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/c56e6f02994b/JCD-16-352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/b820150c5a28/JCD-16-352-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/8d187003a090/JCD-16-352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/33a3b6603b54/JCD-16-352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/bd06486e3c7a/JCD-16-352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/f0324dcc37db/JCD-16-352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/c56e6f02994b/JCD-16-352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e6/3740649/b820150c5a28/JCD-16-352-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of various herbal irrigants as a final rinse on the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis by fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscope.通过荧光共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察不同草药冲洗剂作为终末冲洗液对粪肠球菌黏附的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):352-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.114365.
2
Effect of the combination of several irrigants on dentine surface properties, adsorption of chlorhexidine and adhesion of microorganisms to dentine.几种冲洗剂联合使用对牙本质表面特性、氯己定吸附及微生物对牙本质黏附的影响。
Int Endod J. 2018 Dec;51(12):1420-1433. doi: 10.1111/iej.12960. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
3
Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficiency of a Combination of 1% Alexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite on Biofilm Models: An Study.1% 氯己定与次氯酸钠联合用药对生物膜模型抗菌效果的评估:一项研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):1090-1094.
4
Influence of Endodontic Procedure on the Adherence of Enterococcus faecalis.根管治疗术对粪肠球菌黏附的影响。
J Endod. 2019 Jul;45(7):943-949. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
A comparative evaluation of , green tea polyphenols, and Triphala with 5% sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigant against : An study.一项将绿茶多酚、三果木与5%次氯酸钠作为根管冲洗剂对[具体细菌名称未给出]进行比较评估的研究:一项[研究类型未给出]研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Mar-Apr;15(2):117-122.
6
Evaluation of Morinda citrifolia as an endodontic irrigant.海巴戟天作为一种根管冲洗剂的评估。
J Endod. 2008 Jan;34(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.016.
7
Confocal microscopy evaluation of the effect of irrigants on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: An in vitro study.共聚焦显微镜评估冲洗剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的影响:一项体外研究。
Scanning. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):57-62. doi: 10.1002/sca.21241. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
8
Ex vivo antimicrobial efficacy of strong acid electrolytic water against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.强酸电解水对粪肠球菌生物膜的体外抗菌效果
Int Endod J. 2013 Oct;46(10):938-46. doi: 10.1111/iej.12084. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
9
Effect of Propolis Nanoparticles against Biofilm in the Root Canal.蜂胶纳米粒子对根管生物膜的作用。
Molecules. 2021 Jan 30;26(3):715. doi: 10.3390/molecules26030715.
10
Antimicrobial effectiveness of grape seed extract against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy analysis.葡萄籽提取物对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌效果:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜分析
Aust Endod J. 2020 Aug;46(2):191-196. doi: 10.1111/aej.12390. Epub 2019 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial efficacy of two commercially available herbal products with and without ultrasonic activation in primary endodontic infections: A randomized clinical trial.两种市售草药产品在有无超声激活情况下对原发性牙髓感染的抗菌效果:一项随机临床试验
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):305-309. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_308_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
Nimbolide: promising agent for prevention and treatment of chronic diseases (recent update).印楝素:预防和治疗慢性病的有前景药物(最新进展)。
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Mar 18;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.9650. eCollection 2024.
3
Can natural irrigants replace sodium hypochlorite? A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro evaluation of five different herbal extracts as an antimicrobial endodontic irrigant using real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.使用实时定量聚合酶链反应对五种不同草药提取物作为抗菌牙髓冲洗剂进行体外评估。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Mar;16(2):167-70. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.108208.
2
Root canal irrigants.根管冲洗剂
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):256-64. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.73378.
3
Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Triphala and green tea polyphenols), MTAD, and 5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on tooth substrate: an in vitro study.
能否用天然冲洗剂替代次氯酸钠?系统综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):1831-1849. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04913-7. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
4
A. juss, L. and as herbal endodontic irrigants: A scoping review.A. 尤斯,L. 以及作为草药牙髓冲洗剂:一项范围综述。 (你提供的原文似乎存在一些不完整或不准确之处,正常表述可能应该是“A. Juss, L. and... as herbal endodontic irrigants: A scoping review.” ,这里按照你给定的内容尽量准确翻译了 )
Ayu. 2020 Jul-Sep;41(3):148-158. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_102_20. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Comparison of Herbal Agents with Sodium Hypochlorite as Root Canal Irrigant: A Systematic Review of Studies.草药制剂与次氯酸钠作为根管冲洗剂的比较:研究的系统评价
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Nov 25;2021:8967219. doi: 10.1155/2021/8967219. eCollection 2021.
6
The Antibacterial Efficacy of Persian Green Tea Extract as an Intracanal Irrigant on Biofilm.波斯绿茶提取物作为根管内冲洗剂对生物膜的抗菌效果
Iran Endod J. 2016 Fall;11(4):304-308. doi: 10.22037/iej.2016.9.
7
Natural Therapeutic Options in Endodontics - A Review.牙髓病学中的自然治疗选择——综述
Open Dent J. 2016 May 11;10:214-26. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010214. eCollection 2016.
8
Comparative anti-microbial efficacy of Azadirachta indica irrigant with standard endodontic irrigants: A preliminary study.印度楝树冲洗剂与标准根管冲洗剂的抗菌效果比较:一项初步研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Mar;17(2):133-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.128047.
评价草药替代物(三果汤和绿茶多酚)、MTAD 和 5%次氯酸钠对牙本质上形成的粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌功效:一项体外研究。
J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.040.
4
Influence of endodontic chemical treatment on Enterococcus faecalis adherence to collagen studied with laser scanning confocal microscopy and optical tweezers: a preliminary study.
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Jul-Aug;13(4):044017. doi: 10.1117/1.2957972.
5
Dentinal tubule invasion and adherence by Enterococcus faecalis.粪肠球菌对牙本质小管的侵入与黏附
Int Endod J. 2008 Oct;41(10):873-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01445.x.
6
Influence of irrigation regimens on the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to root canal dentin.冲洗方案对粪肠球菌黏附于根管牙本质的影响。
J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):850-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.006.
7
Comparison of regrowth of Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules after sealing with gutta-percha or Resilon.牙胶或瑞速根管封闭剂封闭后牙本质小管内粪肠球菌再生长情况的比较
J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):445-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.019. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
8
Evaluation of Morinda citrifolia as an endodontic irrigant.海巴戟天作为一种根管冲洗剂的评估。
J Endod. 2008 Jan;34(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.016.
9
Redefining the persistent infection in root canals: possible role of biofilm communities.重新定义根管内的持续性感染:生物膜群落的潜在作用。
J Endod. 2007 Jun;33(6):652-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.004. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
10
Response to alkaline stress by root canal bacteria in biofilms.根管生物膜中细菌对碱性应激的反应。
Int Endod J. 2007 May;40(5):344-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01226.x. Epub 2007 Feb 27.