Suppr超能文献

草药制剂与次氯酸钠作为根管冲洗剂的比较:研究的系统评价

Comparison of Herbal Agents with Sodium Hypochlorite as Root Canal Irrigant: A Systematic Review of Studies.

作者信息

Teja Kavalipurapu Venkata, Janani Krishnamachari, Srivastava Kumar Chandan, Shrivastava Deepti, Jose Jerry, Marya Anand, Karobari Mohmed Isaqali

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai-89, India.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Nov 25;2021:8967219. doi: 10.1155/2021/8967219. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

During endodontic treatment, eliminating microorganisms from the root canals should be considered with utmost importance. Before filling the canal, every effort should be made to ensure optimal shaping and adequate disinfection of the root canal system. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of herbal agents with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in reducing the microbial load while used as a root canal irrigant. The research question in the present study was to assess "Is there a significant difference in reducing microbial load comparing sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and herbal agents." Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from their start dates to November 2020 using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and reviewed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Only studies comparing herbal agents with NaOCl regarding antimicrobial efficiency were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the included article. 825 articles were obtained from an electronic database. Twenty papers were included for review of the full text. Eleven papers were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, nine articles were included in the systematic review. The present systematic review was at the level; therefore, the result cannot translate the exact clinical conditions. This systematic review concludes that herbal agents cannot be used as a main irrigant for canal disinfection.

摘要

在根管治疗过程中,从根管中清除微生物应被视为重中之重。在根管充填之前,应尽一切努力确保根管系统的最佳塑形和充分消毒。本系统评价旨在比较草药制剂与次氯酸钠(NaOCl)作为根管冲洗剂时在降低微生物负荷方面的疗效。本研究的研究问题是评估“在降低微生物负荷方面,次氯酸钠(NaOCl)与草药制剂相比是否存在显著差异”。使用严格的纳入和排除标准,从电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)的起始日期至2020年11月进行检索,并按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行综述。仅纳入了比较草药制剂与NaOCl抗菌效率的研究。两名评审员独立评估纳入的文章。从电子数据库中获得825篇文章。纳入20篇文章进行全文审查。11篇文章因不符合纳入标准而被排除。最后,9篇文章被纳入系统评价。本系统评价属于[具体级别未给出]级别;因此,结果无法转化为确切的临床情况。本系统评价得出结论,草药制剂不能用作根管消毒的主要冲洗剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93d/8639255/bc7e5e66c3f0/ECAM2021-8967219.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验