a Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden.
Psychother Res. 2014;24(1):91-102. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.826833. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
The aim of this study was to assess whether a modified version of the Emotional Availability Scales (EAS), created to assess interaction quality between parents and children, could be applied to psychotherapy sessions and whether emotional availability (EA), as assessed by the modified EAS-T, was associated with client- and therapist-rated working alliance. EAS-T was used to assess 42 sessions from 16 therapies. The therapies came from the LURIPP project, comparing IPT with BRT for depressed clients. The results showed that sessions could be reliably rated with EAS-T. Most rating scales had acceptable variance. The client's perception of task alliance was associated with several of the EA subscales (sensitivity, nonhostility, responsiveness) assessed over therapies, whereas the perception of bond was associated with Structure on EAS.
本研究旨在评估一种经过改良的情绪可及性量表（EAS）是否可用于评估父母与子女之间的互动质量，以及改良后的 EAS-T 评估的情绪可及性（EA）是否与客户和治疗师评定的工作联盟相关。EAS-T 用于评估 16 种治疗方法中的 42 个疗程。这些治疗方法来自 LURIPP 项目，比较了IPT 与 BRT 对抑郁客户的效果。结果表明，EAS-T 可以可靠地对疗程进行评分。大多数评分量表的方差都可以接受。客户对任务联盟的感知与在治疗过程中评估的几个 EA 子量表（敏感性、非敌意、响应性）相关，而对联系的感知则与 EAS 的结构相关。
