• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生转介至专业精神卫生保健机构的推荐内容:一项定性多视角研究。

Recommended content of referral letters from general practitioners to specialised mental health care: a qualitative multi-perspective study.

机构信息

Research Network on Integrated Health Care in Western Norway, Helse Fonna HF, Valen Hospital, N-5451, Haugesund, Valen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 19;13:329. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-329.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-329
PMID:23958371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751904/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In most Western countries, the referral letter forms the basis for establishing the priority of patients for specialised health care and for the coordination of care between the services. To be able to define the quality of referral letters, the potential impact of the quality on the organisation of care, and to improve the quality of the letters, we need a multidimensional definition of the ideal content. The study's aim was to explore what information is seen as most important and should be included in referral letters from primary care to specialised mental health care to facilitate prioritisation and planning of treatment and follow-up of the patients.

METHODS

Based on purposive sampling, four mixed discussion groups, which included general practitioners, mental health nurses from primary health care, psychiatrists and psychologists from specialised mental health care, managers and patient representatives, were formed; they were asked to identify the information they considered important in a mental health referral letter. In line with the Delphi technique, the importance of the themes was later individually rated by the participants. The study was conducted within The Western Norway Regional Health Authority.

RESULTS

The four groups identified 174 information themes. After excluding themes that were assessed as duplicates, replaceable or less important, 40 themes were suggested, organised in seven units. A set of check-off points of essential information is recommended as an introduction in the referral letter.

CONCLUSION

Compared with general guidelines and guidelines for somatic care, the results of this study suggest that the referral letter to specialised mental health care should have a larger emphasis on the overall treatment plan, on the specific role of specialised health care in the continuum of care, and on patient involvement. Further research should evaluate the validity of these findings for other patient groups in need of integrated care and investigate how the quality of referral letters affects patient-related and organisational outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01374035.

摘要

背景

在大多数西方国家,转诊信是确定患者接受专科医疗保健的优先级和协调服务之间的护理的基础。为了能够定义转诊信的质量、质量对护理组织的潜在影响,并提高信件的质量,我们需要对理想内容进行多维定义。本研究旨在探讨从初级保健到专科精神卫生保健的转诊信中应包含哪些被认为是最重要的信息,以促进患者的优先排序和治疗计划,并对其进行随访。

方法

基于目的抽样,成立了四个混合讨论小组,包括全科医生、初级保健的精神科护士、专科精神卫生保健的精神科医生和心理学家、管理人员和患者代表;他们被要求确定他们认为在精神科转诊信中重要的信息。根据德尔菲技术,后来由参与者单独对主题的重要性进行评分。该研究在西挪威地区卫生局进行。

结果

四个小组确定了 174 个信息主题。在排除被评估为重复、可替代或不太重要的主题后,建议了 40 个主题,并将其组织成七个单元。建议在转诊信中引入一套必不可少的信息核对点。

结论

与一般指南和躯体护理指南相比,本研究结果表明,专科精神卫生保健的转诊信应更加注重整体治疗计划、专科卫生保健在护理连续体中的具体作用以及患者的参与。进一步的研究应评估这些发现对于需要综合护理的其他患者群体的有效性,并调查转诊信的质量如何影响患者相关和组织结果。

试验注册号

NCT01374035。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/108f/3751904/18f6bf8c1243/1472-6963-13-329-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/108f/3751904/4fae9ee2173c/1472-6963-13-329-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/108f/3751904/18f6bf8c1243/1472-6963-13-329-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/108f/3751904/4fae9ee2173c/1472-6963-13-329-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/108f/3751904/18f6bf8c1243/1472-6963-13-329-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Recommended content of referral letters from general practitioners to specialised mental health care: a qualitative multi-perspective study.全科医生转介至专业精神卫生保健机构的推荐内容:一项定性多视角研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 19;13:329. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-329.
2
Quality indicators for the referral process from primary to specialised mental health care: an explorative study in accordance with the RAND appropriateness method.从初级心理健康护理到专科心理健康护理的转诊过程质量指标:一项按照兰德适宜性方法进行的探索性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1941-1.
3
The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage.转诊信质量对及时获得专业精神卫生保健的影响:对患者分诊可靠性的定量研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08139-3.
4
The Western Norway mental health interface study: a controlled intervention trial on referral letters between primary care and specialist mental health care.挪威西部心理健康界面研究:初级保健与专科精神卫生保健之间转诊信的对照干预试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 14;11:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-177.
5
The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessment.医院医生与全科医生之间关于老年患者的沟通质量:一项小组研究评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug 24;7:133. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-133.
6
Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial.评估交互式动态转诊界面(IDRI)对全科医生向胃肠病专家转诊信质量的影响:一项随机交叉 vignette 试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e014636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014636.
7
An appraisal of the quality of referral letters from general dental practitioners to a temporomandibular disorder clinic.对普通牙科医生转诊至颞下颌关节紊乱病诊所的转诊信质量的评估。
Prim Dent Care. 2003 Oct;10(4):105-8. doi: 10.1308/135576103322363451.
8
A letter of consequence: referral letters from general practitioners to secondary mental health services.一封重要信函:全科医生给二级心理健康服务机构的转诊信。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Jan;15(1):116-28. doi: 10.1177/1049732304270725.
9
Practical health co-operation - the impact of a referral template on quality of care and health care co-operation: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.实用健康合作 - 转诊模板对医疗质量和医疗合作的影响:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Jan 7;14:7. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-7.
10
The effects of audit and feedback and electronic referrals on the quality of primary care referral letters.审核与反馈以及电子转诊对基层医疗转诊信质量的影响。
J Prim Health Care. 2014 Dec 1;6(4):324-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and testing of the QDis-MH checklist for discharge letters from specialised mental healthcare: a stakeholder-centred study.专业精神保健出院小结 QDis-MH 清单的制定和测试:一项以利益相关者为中心的研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Apr;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002036.
2
Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare.全科医生转诊信对儿童和青少年精神保健的信息价值。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;32(2):303-315. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01859-7. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
Quality indicators for the referral process from primary to specialised mental health care: an explorative study in accordance with the RAND appropriateness method.

本文引用的文献

1
General practitioners' reflections on referring: an asymmetric or non-dialogical process?全科医生转诊的反思:非对称或非对话过程?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012 Dec;30(4):241-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.711190. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
2
Horizontal equity and mental health care: a study of priority ratings by clinicians and teams at outpatient clinics.横向公平与精神卫生保健:对门诊临床医生和团队的优先排序的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 15;12:162. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-162.
3
Referral Writer: preliminary evidence for the value of comprehensive referral letters.
从初级心理健康护理到专科心理健康护理的转诊过程质量指标:一项按照兰德适宜性方法进行的探索性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1941-1.
4
Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations.医疗保健中的沟通:文献综述与实用建议
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1257-67. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12686. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Factors explaining priority setting at community mental health centres: a quantitative analysis of referral assessments.解释社区心理健康中心优先次序设定的因素:转诊评估的定量分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 14;14:620. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0620-3.
转诊信撰写者:综合转诊信价值的初步证据。
Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(1):39-45.
4
The Western Norway mental health interface study: a controlled intervention trial on referral letters between primary care and specialist mental health care.挪威西部心理健康界面研究:初级保健与专科精神卫生保健之间转诊信的对照干预试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 14;11:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-177.
5
Reducing variation in general practitioner referral rates through clinical engagement and peer review of referrals: a service improvement project.通过临床参与和转诊同行评审降低全科医生转诊率的差异:一项服务改进项目。
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(4):263-72.
6
Development and validation of a tool to improve paediatric referral/consultation communication.开发并验证一种改进儿科转诊/会诊沟通的工具。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):692-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045781. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
7
Indicators for follow-up of multidisciplinary teamwork in care processes: results of an international expert panel.多学科团队协作在护理过程中的随访指标:国际专家小组的研究结果。
Eval Health Prof. 2011 Sep;34(3):258-77. doi: 10.1177/0163278710393736. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
8
How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.全科医生和专科医生如何看待他们之间的相互沟通?一项调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug 8;9:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-143.
9
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
10
The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessment.医院医生与全科医生之间关于老年患者的沟通质量:一项小组研究评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug 24;7:133. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-133.