• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生一年级解剖学的同伴评估。

Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):144-52. doi: 10.1002/ase.1394. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1002/ase.1394
PMID:23959790
Abstract

Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid-course and end-of-course evaluation included open-ended comments, as well as a five-point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid- to end-of-course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid-course assessments. Seventy-six percent of the class agreed with the statement: "Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers." The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid-course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits.

摘要

同伴评估已被证明是促进医学生专业素养的有效工具。同伴评估在解剖学解剖实验室中可能特别有用,因为所需的密切合作和长时间的解剖实验室可以让学生深入了解他们同伴的工作习惯和人际交往能力。本研究的目的是定量和定性分析在大体解剖学中使用经过验证的同伴评估工具。一年级医学院的学生使用在线调查工具对他们解剖小组的三名成员进行评估。中期和期末评估包括开放式评论,以及五分制,用于衡量三个工作习惯、两个人际交往属性和一个总体评分。所有 267 名学生都完成了作业。总体评分和其他五个评估类别中的四个从中期到期末评估都有显著提高。定量和定性数据还显示,接受中期评估最低分的学生有显著进步。76%的学生同意这样的说法:“根据我收到的反馈,我改变了与同伴合作或教学的方式。”学生在解剖学中使用这种同伴评估工具与工作习惯和人际交往属性的提高有关,特别是接受中期反馈最低的学生群体。同伴评估为学生提供了一个提高人际交往能力和工作习惯的机会。

相似文献

1
Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy.医学生一年级解剖学的同伴评估。
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):144-52. doi: 10.1002/ase.1394. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
2
Use of individual feedback during human gross anatomy course for enhancing professional behaviors in doctor of physical therapy students.在人体解剖学课程中使用个体反馈来增强物理治疗专业学生的专业行为。
Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;6(5):324-31. doi: 10.1002/ase.1356. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
3
Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism.小组和个体反馈在大体解剖学中促进医学生职业素养的比较效果。
Anat Sci Educ. 2010 Mar-Apr;3(2):64-72. doi: 10.1002/ase.142.
4
Peer-assessment of medical communication skills: the impact of students' personality, academic and social reputation on behavioural assessment.学生个性、学业和社会声誉对行为评估的影响:医学沟通技能的同伴评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
5
Reciprocal peer teaching: students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory.相互同伴教学:学生在大体解剖实验室中互相教学。
Clin Anat. 2005 May;18(4):296-301. doi: 10.1002/ca.20090.
6
Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.评分者选择对医学生同伴评估的影响。
Med Educ. 2006 Nov;40(11):1088-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02613.x.
7
A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations.一种通过配对的自我和同伴评估使用多源反馈来评估临床前医学生职业素养的新方法。
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):402-410. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1306446. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
Supporting students in self-regulation: use of formative feedback and portfolios in a problem-based learning setting.支持学生自我调节:在基于问题的学习环境中使用形成性反馈和档案袋。
Med Teach. 2013 Aug;35(8):655-60. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.785630. Epub 2013 May 3.
9
Temporal and group-related trends in peer assessment amongst medical students.医学生同伴评估中与时间和群体相关的趋势。
Med Educ. 2006 Sep;40(9):840-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02540.x.
10
"Safe Harbor": evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course.“避风港”:大体解剖课程中专业精神案例讨论干预的评估。
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):191-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.1395. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Investigation of First-Year Medical Students' Professionalism Competency Development over the Gross Anatomy Course.一项关于一年级医学生在大体解剖学课程中专业能力发展的混合方法研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 14;35(1):389-402. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02204-8. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Rubric for peer evaluation of oral presentations: Use and perceptions among experienced and non-experienced students.口头报告同行评价量表:有经验和无经验学生的使用情况及看法
J Dent Educ. 2025 Aug;89(8):1211-1220. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13831. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
Peer Feedback: Recommendations for Behavior Analysts' Training and Supervision.
同行反馈:行为分析师培训与督导的建议
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Dec 1;16(3):696-708. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00761-1. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.高等卫生保健教育项目中的形成性同伴评估:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e045345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345.
5
Peer assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education.本科生医学教育中的专业精神同行评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 11;20(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02412-x.
6
A comparison of peer and faculty narrative feedback on medical student oral research presentations.医学生口头研究报告中同行与教师叙述性反馈的比较。
Int J Med Educ. 2020 Sep 30;11:222-229. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5f64.690b.
7
The effect of demographic characteristics, Country of birth and country of medical training on the peer evaluations of internal medicine resident physicians.人口统计学特征、出生国家和医学培训国家对内科住院医师同行评价的影响。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019 Apr 12;9(2):92-97. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1586278. eCollection 2019 Apr.
8
Peer Feedback on Collaborative Learning Activities in Veterinary Education.兽医教育中协作学习活动的同伴反馈
Vet Sci. 2018 Oct 17;5(4):90. doi: 10.3390/vetsci5040090.
9
Students as anatomy near-peer teachers: a double-edged sword for an ancient skill.学生作为解剖学的准教师:古老技能的双刃剑。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0996-y.
10
Current Practices in Assessing Professionalism in United States and Canadian Allopathic Medical Students and Residents.美国和加拿大对抗疗法医学生及住院医师职业素养评估的当前做法
Cureus. 2017 May 22;9(5):e1267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1267.