Suppr超能文献

医学生一年级解剖学的同伴评估。

Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):144-52. doi: 10.1002/ase.1394. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

Abstract

Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid-course and end-of-course evaluation included open-ended comments, as well as a five-point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid- to end-of-course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid-course assessments. Seventy-six percent of the class agreed with the statement: "Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers." The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid-course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits.

摘要

同伴评估已被证明是促进医学生专业素养的有效工具。同伴评估在解剖学解剖实验室中可能特别有用,因为所需的密切合作和长时间的解剖实验室可以让学生深入了解他们同伴的工作习惯和人际交往能力。本研究的目的是定量和定性分析在大体解剖学中使用经过验证的同伴评估工具。一年级医学院的学生使用在线调查工具对他们解剖小组的三名成员进行评估。中期和期末评估包括开放式评论,以及五分制,用于衡量三个工作习惯、两个人际交往属性和一个总体评分。所有 267 名学生都完成了作业。总体评分和其他五个评估类别中的四个从中期到期末评估都有显著提高。定量和定性数据还显示,接受中期评估最低分的学生有显著进步。76%的学生同意这样的说法:“根据我收到的反馈,我改变了与同伴合作或教学的方式。”学生在解剖学中使用这种同伴评估工具与工作习惯和人际交往属性的提高有关,特别是接受中期反馈最低的学生群体。同伴评估为学生提供了一个提高人际交往能力和工作习惯的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验