• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估临床研究效率的常用指标。

Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):432-46. doi: 10.1177/0163278713499586. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1177/0163278713499586
PMID:23960270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4019992/
Abstract

The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program was designed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop processes and infrastructure for clinical and translational research throughout the United States. The CTSA initiative now funds 61 institutions. In 2012, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, which administers the CTSA Program, charged the Evaluation Key Function Committee of the CTSA Consortium to develop common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research processes and outcomes. At this writing, the committee has identified 15 metrics in six categories. It has also developed a standardized protocol to define, pilot test, refine, and implement the metrics. The ultimate goal is to learn critical lessons about how to evaluate the processes and outcomes of clinical research within the CTSAs and beyond. This article describes the work involved in developing and applying common metrics and benchmarks of evaluation.

摘要

临床与转化科学研究奖(CTSA)计划由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)设计,旨在为全美临床和转化研究开发流程和基础设施。CTSA 计划现资助 61 个机构。2012 年,管理 CTSA 计划的国家推进转化科学中心(National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences)责成 CTSA 联盟的评估关键功能委员会制定共同指标,以评估临床研究流程和结果的效率。在撰写本文时,该委员会已经确定了六个类别的 15 项指标。它还制定了一个标准化协议来定义、试点测试、改进和实施这些指标。最终目标是了解有关如何在 CTSA 及其以外的范围内评估临床研究流程和结果的关键经验教训。本文描述了制定和应用通用指标和评估基准的工作。

相似文献

1
Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research.评估临床研究效率的常用指标。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):432-46. doi: 10.1177/0163278713499586. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
2
Heterogeneity at work: implications of the 2012 Clinical Translational Science Award evaluators survey.工作中的异质性:2012 年临床转化科学奖评估者调查的启示。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):447-63. doi: 10.1177/0163278713510378.
3
Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs): Lessons Learned.为临床与转化科学奖(CTSAs)制定通用指标:经验教训
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):451-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12296. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
CTSA-IP: a solution to identifying and aggregating intellectual property across the NIH Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium of biomedical research institutes.CTSA-IP:一种用于确定和聚合美国国立卫生研究院临床转化科学奖(CTSA)联盟内生物医学研究所知识产权的解决方案。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):328-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00308.x.
5
Evaluation guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs).临床与转化科学奖(CTSAs)评估指南。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):303-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12036. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
6
Emergency Medicine Resources Within the Clinical Translational Science Institutes: A Cross-sectional Study.临床转化科学研究所内的急诊医学资源:一项横断面研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):740-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12926. Epub 2016 May 14.
7
Working with the CTSA Consortium: what we bring to the table.与 CTSA 联盟合作:我们的优势所在。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Dec 22;2(63):63mr5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001635.
8
Evaluation and the NIH clinical and translational science awards: a "top ten" list.评价与 NIH 临床与转化科学奖:十大要点
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):411-31. doi: 10.1177/0163278713507061.
9
Assessing the impact of the NIH CTSA program on institutionally sponsored clinical trials.评估 NIH CTSA 计划对机构赞助临床试验的影响。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Jun;6(3):196-200. doi: 10.1111/cts.12029. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
10
Implementing Common Metrics across the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) consortium.在国立卫生研究院临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)联盟中实施通用指标。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Nov 26;4(1):16-21. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.425. eCollection 2020 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Modernizing CTSA hub evaluation: an integrated system for performance monitoring and translational science impact assessment.优化临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)中心评估:一个用于绩效监测和转化科学影响评估的综合系统
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Mar 31;10:1534394. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1534394. eCollection 2025.
2
Harmonizing Quality Improvement Metrics Across Global Trial Networks to Advance Paediatric Clinical Trials Delivery.协调全球试验网络中的质量改进指标,以推进儿科临床试验的实施。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Sep;58(5):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00663-0. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Prioritising and incentivising productivity within indicator-based approaches to Research Impact Assessment: a commentary.基于指标的研究影响评估方法中优先考虑和激励生产力:评论。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01082-7.
4
"We're Not Providing the Best Care If We Are Not on the Cutting Edge of Research": A Research Impact Evaluation at a Regional Australian Hospital and Health Service.如果我们不能站在研究的前沿,我们就无法提供最好的护理:澳大利亚一家地区医院和卫生服务机构的研究影响评估。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):3000-3011. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6529. Epub 2022 May 22.
5
The Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Consortium: A Blueprint for Inclusive Excellence.少数民族机构研究中心(RCMI)联盟:包容性卓越的蓝图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6848. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136848.
6
Pilot test of an accrual Common Metric for the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Consortium: Metric usefulness.美国国立卫生研究院临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)联盟应计通用指标的初步测试:指标的实用性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep 22;5(1):e50. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.544.
7
Acute care research competencies for clinical research professionals.临床研究专业人员的急性护理研究能力。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 13;4(6):485-492. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.38.
8
Is this study feasible? Facilitating management of pragmatic trial planning milestones under a phased award funding mechanism.这项研究是否可行?在分阶段奖励资助机制下,促进实用临床试验计划里程碑的管理。
Trials. 2019 May 30;20(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3387-3.
9
Scope, Influence, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The Publication Portfolio of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2017.范围、影响与跨学科合作:2006年至2017年美国国立卫生研究院临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)项目的出版物组合
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):169-179. doi: 10.1177/0163278719839435. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
10
Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative.对社区参与研究伙伴关系的信任:设计多中心临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)计划的方法概述
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):180-192. doi: 10.1177/0163278718819719. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for a National Evaluation of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards.国家临床与转化科学奖评估策略。
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Apr;5(2):138-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00381.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis.美国国立卫生研究院资助的临床试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上的发表情况:横断面分析。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d7292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7292.
3
Steps and time to process clinical trials at the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.癌症治疗评估项目中临床试验的处理步骤和时间。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1761-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9133. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
4
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.