Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病运动能力的肺动脉高压特异性治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary hypertension specific therapy for exercise capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Wonkwang University, Sanbon Hospital, Gunpo, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Aug;28(8):1200-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.8.1200. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Abstract

Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have pulmonary hypertension (PH) that adversely affects survival. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether PH-specific therapies have an effect for stable COPD. Data sources were Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Korea med and references from relevant publications. Randomized prospective trials that compared PH specific therapy in COPD for more than 6 weeks with placebo were included. The outcomes were the exercise capacity and adverse events. Four randomized controlled trials involving 109 subjects were included in the analysis. Two trials involved bosentan, one sildenafil and one beraprost. The studies varied in duration of treatment from 3 to 18 months. In a pooled analysis of four trials, exercise-capacity was not significantly improved with PH-specific treatment for COPD (risk ratio, -5.1; 95% CI, -13.0 to 2.8). COPD with overt PH significantly improved the exercise capacity (mean difference, 111.6; 95% CI, 63.3 to 159.9) but COPD with PH unknown did not (mean difference, 26.6; 95% CI, -24.3 to 77.5). There was no significant difference in hypoxemia (mean difference, 2.6; 95% CI, -3.7 to 8.8). PH specific treatments have a significant effect in improving exercise capacity in COPD with overt PH.

摘要

一些患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者存在肺动脉高压(PH),这会对生存产生不利影响。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 PH 特异性治疗对稳定期 COPD 的影响。数据来源为 Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、韩国医学数据库和相关文献的参考文献。纳入了比较 PH 特异性治疗在 COPD 中超过 6 周与安慰剂的随机前瞻性试验。结局为运动能力和不良事件。分析纳入了四项涉及 109 名受试者的随机对照试验。两项试验涉及波生坦,一项涉及西地那非,一项涉及贝前列素。研究的治疗持续时间从 3 个月到 18 个月不等。四项试验的汇总分析显示,PH 特异性治疗对 COPD 并没有显著改善运动能力(风险比,-5.1;95%置信区间,-13.0 至 2.8)。明显的 PH 性 COPD 显著改善了运动能力(平均差异,111.6;95%置信区间,63.3 至 159.9),但 PH 未知的 COPD 则没有(平均差异,26.6;95%置信区间,-24.3 至 77.5)。低氧血症无显著差异(平均差异,2.6;95%置信区间,-3.7 至 8.8)。PH 特异性治疗在改善明显 PH 性 COPD 患者的运动能力方面具有显著效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6565/3744709/abef4f661636/jkms-28-1200-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验