Drolet Marie-Josée
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières , Trois-Rivières, Québec , Canada.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2014 Jan;21(1):2-10. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2013.831118. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
This article describes the results of a study analyzing several discourses on the values of occupational therapy and some philosophical assumptions upon which these values are based.
A qualitative study of several values statements using the hermeneutical method--a conventional analytical approach in philosophy--was conducted.
The literature review reveals that opinions on the values of occupational therapy differ greatly--no one value is shared among all the values statements examined. However, the majority of the texts mention occupational participation. A philosophical analysis of the literature shows that this value is based on a conception of human beings that can be traced back to the philosophical anthropologies of thinkers like Marx, Rousseau, Sartre, and Kant. The philosophical analysis also brought to light a certain conceptual confusion about what a value is.
This article therefore offers some conceptual clarifications to help distinguish between values, beliefs, attitudes, principles, and non-evaluative concepts. It also presents the implications for practice of this philosophical analysis of values statements of the profession.
本文描述了一项研究的结果，该研究分析了关于职业治疗价值的几种论述以及这些价值所基于的一些哲学假设。
采用诠释学方法（哲学中的一种传统分析方法）对几种价值陈述进行了定性研究。
文献综述表明，对于职业治疗价值的观点差异很大——在所审查的所有价值陈述中，没有一种价值是共同的。然而，大多数文本都提到了职业参与。对文献的哲学分析表明，这一价值基于一种对人类的概念，这种概念可以追溯到马克思、卢梭、萨特和康德等思想家的哲学人类学。哲学分析还揭示了关于价值是什么存在一定的概念混淆。
因此，本文提供了一些概念上的澄清，以帮助区分价值、信念、态度、原则和非评价性概念。它还阐述了对该专业价值陈述进行这种哲学分析对实践的影响。
