Suppr超能文献

双氯芬酸二乙胺 1.16%凝胶治疗急性颈痛的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

机构信息

Deutsche Sporthoschschule Köln, Köln, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Aug 21;14:250. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-250.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder in primary care that frequently causes discomfort. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be used to reduce neck pain and associated inflammation and facilitate earlier recovery. Topical diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) 1.16% gel is clinically proven to be effective and well tolerated in acute and chronic musculoskeletal conditions, but until now no clinical data existed for its use in acute NP. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DDEA 1.16% gel compared with placebo gel in acute NP.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with acute NP (n = 72) were treated with DDEA 1.16% gel (2 g, 4x/day, for 5 days) or placebo. Efficacy assessments included pain-on-movement (POM), pain-at-rest (PAR), functional neck disability index (NDI) and response to treatment (decrease in POM by 50% after 48 h). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, POM at 48 h, was statistically significantly lower with DDEA gel (19.5 mm) vs. placebo (56.9 mm) (p < 0.0001), representing a clinically relevant decrease from baseline (75% vs. 23%, respectively). All POM scores were significantly lower with DDEA gel vs. placebo from 1 h, as were PAR and NDI scores from first assessment (24 h) onwards (all p < 0.0001). Response to treatment was significantly higher with DDEA gel (94.4%) vs. placebo (8.3%) (p < 0.0001). There were no AEs with DDEA gel.

CONCLUSIONS

DDEA 1.16% gel, which is available over-the-counter, was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute neck pain. The tools used to assess efficacy suggest that it quickly reduced neck pain and improved neck function. However, questions remain regarding the comparability and validity of such tools. Further studies will help ascertain whether DDEA 1.16% gel offers an alternative treatment option in this common, often debilitating condition.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01335724.

摘要

背景

颈部疼痛(NP)是初级保健中常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,常引起不适。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可用于减轻颈部疼痛和相关炎症,促进早期康复。临床已证实,双氯芬酸二乙胺(DDEA)1.16%凝胶在急性和慢性肌肉骨骼疾病中有效且耐受性良好,但迄今为止,尚无其在急性 NP 中使用的临床数据。本研究旨在评估 DDEA 1.16%凝胶与安慰剂凝胶在急性 NP 中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,72 例急性 NP 患者(n=72)接受 DDEA 1.16%凝胶(2g,4x/天,连用 5 天)或安慰剂治疗。疗效评估包括运动时疼痛(POM)、静息时疼痛(PAR)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和治疗反应(48 小时后 POM 下降 50%)。在整个研究过程中记录不良事件(AE)。

结果

主要结局指标,48 小时时的 POM,DDEA 凝胶(19.5mm)显著低于安慰剂(56.9mm)(p<0.0001),与基线相比具有临床相关的降低(分别为 75%和 23%)。从 1 小时开始,DDEA 凝胶组的所有 POM 评分均显著低于安慰剂组,从首次评估(24 小时)开始,PAR 和 NDI 评分也显著低于安慰剂组(均 p<0.0001)。DDEA 凝胶的治疗反应显著高于安慰剂(94.4% vs. 8.3%)(p<0.0001)。DDEA 凝胶无 AE。

结论

非处方可得的 DDEA 1.16%凝胶在治疗急性颈痛方面有效且耐受性良好。用于评估疗效的工具表明,它能迅速减轻颈部疼痛并改善颈部功能。然而,关于这些工具的可比性和有效性仍存在疑问。进一步的研究将有助于确定 DDEA 1.16%凝胶是否为这种常见且常使人虚弱的疾病提供了另一种治疗选择。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01335724。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dde/3847223/e0dec04e79df/1471-2474-14-250-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验