• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施医生配备的直升机:对首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的影响。

Implementation of a physician-staffed helicopter: impact on time to primary PCI.

机构信息

Departments of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, and Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2013 Aug 22;9(4):477-83. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I4A77.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV9I4A77
PMID:23965353
Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to compare air (AIR) and ground transport (GRD) of STEMI patients bound for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective, controlled, observational study, including patients in whom STEMI was suspected outside a 30-minute driving distance from the PCI centre. AIR patients in a 12-month period (May 1, 2010, to April 30, 2011) were compared with GRD patients in a 16-month period (January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2011). The primary endpoint was time from ECG consistent with STEMI to arrival in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. We included 450 patients, 114 AIR and 336 GRD patients. The median (5-95% range) transport distance was 97 (62-162) vs. 94 (64-172) kilometres, respectively (p=0.01). Time from ECG to cardiac catheterisation laboratory arrival was significantly lower in the AIR group (median 84 minutes (60-160) vs.104 minutes [63-225], p<0.01). Time from ECG to balloon was 114 (78-221) minutes vs.132 (84-262) (p<0.01), respectively. The 30-day mortality was 2.2% (2/91) for AIR and 6.9% (18/262) for GRD patients (p=0.10). One-year mortality was 6.7%, (6/90) vs. 9.9% (26/262) (p=0.35), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Air transport seemed superior to ground transportation in reducing time from ECG diagnosis to arrival in the catheterisation laboratory for STEMI patients outside a 30-minute driving distance to the PCI centre.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)前 STEMI 患者的空中(AIR)和地面转运(GRD)。

方法和结果

这是一项前瞻性、对照、观察性研究,纳入了距 PCI 中心 30 分钟车程以外怀疑发生 STEMI 的患者。在 12 个月的时间内(2010 年 5 月 1 日至 2011 年 4 月 30 日),AIR 患者与在 16 个月时间内(2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 4 月 30 日)的 GRD 患者进行比较。主要终点是从心电图符合 STEMI 到到达心导管实验室的时间。共纳入 450 例患者,其中 114 例 AIR 患者和 336 例 GRD 患者。转运距离中位数(5-95%范围)分别为 97(62-162)km 和 94(64-172)km(p=0.01)。AIR 组心电图至心导管实验室到达时间明显缩短(中位数 84 分钟[60-160]vs.104 分钟[63-225],p<0.01)。心电图至球囊扩张时间分别为 114(78-221)分钟和 132(84-262)分钟(p<0.01)。AIR 组 30 天死亡率为 2.2%(2/91),GRD 组为 6.9%(18/262)(p=0.10)。AIR 组 1 年死亡率为 6.7%(6/90),GRD 组为 9.9%(26/262)(p=0.35)。

结论

对于距 PCI 中心 30 分钟车程以外的 STEMI 患者,空中转运似乎比地面转运更能缩短心电图诊断至到达导管室的时间。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a physician-staffed helicopter: impact on time to primary PCI.实施医生配备的直升机:对首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Aug 22;9(4):477-83. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I4A77.
2
Is transport with platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibition for primary percutaneous coronary intervention more efficient than on-site thrombolysis in patients with STEMI admitted to community hospitals? Randomised study. Early results.对于入住社区医院的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,使用血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂进行转运是否比现场溶栓更有效?一项随机研究。早期结果。
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Aug;64(8):793-9; discussion 800-1.
3
Clinical pathway: helicopter scene STEMI protocol to facilitate long-distance transfer for primary PCI.临床路径:直升机转运ST段抬高型心肌梗死方案以促进直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长途转运
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012 Dec;11(4):193-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e318261c995.
4
Comparison of in-hospital outcomes with low-dose fibrinolytic therapy followed by urgent percutaneous coronary intervention versus percutaneous coronary intervention alone for treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.比较低剂量溶栓治疗后紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与单纯经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的住院结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jun 1;111(11):1576-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.326. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
5
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: process improvements in rural prehospital care delivered by emergency medical services.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:急救医疗服务在农村院前急救中提高的治疗效果。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;53(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.09.003.
6
Direct ambulance transport to catheterization laboratory reduces door-to-balloon time in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the DIRECT-STEMI study.直接救护车转运至导管室可缩短行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的门球时间:DIRECT-STEMI 研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Mar;124(6):805-10.
7
Efficacy of the radial approach for the performance of primary PCI for STEMI.桡动脉途径用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Mar;25(3):150-3.
8
Arterial access and door-to-balloon times for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的动脉入路和门球时间。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):695-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22373.
9
Helicopter transport effectiveness of patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直升机转运患者进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性
Air Med J. 2013 May-Jun;32(3):144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2012.08.007.
10
Is air transport of stroke patients faster than ground transport? A prospective controlled observational study.中风患者的空中转运比地面转运更快吗?一项前瞻性对照观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Apr;31(4):268-72. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202270. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Helicopter hoist operations in German mid-range mountains retrospective analysis of incidence, medical characteristics, and mission tactics.德国中部山区直升机吊运作业:发病率、医学特征及任务策略的回顾性分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 2;32(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01297-9.
2
The Role of a Physician-Staffed Helicopter in Emergency Care of Patients on Isolated Danish Islands.配备医生的直升机在丹麦偏远岛屿患者急救中的作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;9(11):1446. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111446.
3
Assessment of Transportation by Air for Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction from Non-PCI Centers.
非PCI中心急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者航空转运评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;9(3):299. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030299.
4
The Danish helicopter emergency medical service database: high quality data with great potential.丹麦直升机紧急医疗服务数据库:高质量数据,具有巨大潜力。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 5;27(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0615-5.
5
Overview of doctor-staffed ambulance use in Japan: a nationwide survey and 1-week study.日本配备医生的救护车使用情况概述:一项全国性调查及为期1周的研究
Acute Med Surg. 2018 Jun 4;5(4):316-320. doi: 10.1002/ams2.347. eCollection 2018 Oct.
6
Helicopter vs. ground transportation of patients bound for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直升机与地面交通工具运送拟行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Apr;62(4):568-578. doi: 10.1111/aas.13092. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
7
Outcomes of Physician-Staffed Versus Non-Physician-Staffed Helicopter Transport for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.由医生配备人员与非医生配备人员的直升机转运用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死的结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 2;6(2):e004936. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004936.
8
[Spectrum of missions for a rescue helicopter. Changes in a south German urban area over the last 25 years].[救援直升机的任务范围。德国南部城市地区过去25年的变化]
Anaesthesist. 2014 Dec;63(12):932-41. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2380-1. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
9
[Importance of helicopter rescue].
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2014 Mar;109(2):95-9. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0306-3. Epub 2014 Mar 13.