• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非PCI中心急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者航空转运评估

Assessment of Transportation by Air for Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction from Non-PCI Centers.

作者信息

Trifan Angel Liviu, Dragomir Liliana, Anghele Mihaela, Elkan Eva Maria, Munteanu Sorina, Moscu Cosmina, Stoian Valerian-Ionuț, Telehuz Anca, Zlati Monica Laura, Lungu Mihaiela, Voinescu Doina Carina, Cimpoesu Diana Carmen, Stoleriu Gabriela, Sandu Ion, Sapira Violeta

机构信息

Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.

Research Center in the Field of Social Sciences, "Stefan cel Mare" University, 720229 Suceava, Romania.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;9(3):299. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030299.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare9030299
PMID:33800429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8000528/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the delays that can potentially occur in the emergency transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. We conducted a retrospective study using the medical reports pertaining to 97 patients who presented to the Emergency Department of the Emergency County Hospital of Galati during the year of 2018 with the diagnosis of STEMI and meeting eligibility criteria for PCI, thus warranting transfer to a hospital with PCI facilities. The pick-up time of patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction from the emergency department by the transfer crew is significantly shorter ( < 0.05) than those transferred by air, regardless of the PCI center to which the transfer was performed, Iasi or Bucharest, when compared to the time required to process the patients transferred by land to the same PCI centers. The results of the study shows that the helicopter use for transferring acute myocardial infarction patients to a PCI center must be considered, given the distance between non-PCI and PCI centers is over 200 km.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者紧急转运至经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中心时可能出现的延误情况。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,使用了2018年期间在加拉茨县急救医院急诊科就诊的97例诊断为STEMI且符合PCI资格标准、因此需要转运至具备PCI设施医院的患者的医疗报告。无论转运至哪个PCI中心(雅西或布加勒斯特),与通过陆路转运至相同PCI中心的患者所需处理时间相比,转运人员从急诊科接走诊断为急性心肌梗死患者的时间显著更短(<0.05)。研究结果表明,考虑到非PCI中心与PCI中心之间的距离超过200公里,必须考虑使用直升机将急性心肌梗死患者转运至PCI中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a824/8000528/8c82f5bcbd43/healthcare-09-00299-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a824/8000528/48b22634593f/healthcare-09-00299-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a824/8000528/8c82f5bcbd43/healthcare-09-00299-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a824/8000528/48b22634593f/healthcare-09-00299-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a824/8000528/8c82f5bcbd43/healthcare-09-00299-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Transportation by Air for Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction from Non-PCI Centers.非PCI中心急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者航空转运评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;9(3):299. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030299.
2
Earlier reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by use of helicopter. 采用直升机对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行早期再灌注。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Oct 4;20:70. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-70.
3
Effect of Emergency Medical Service Use and Inter-hospital Transfer on Time to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter Observational Study.急诊医疗服务使用及院间转运对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的影响:一项多中心观察性研究
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):66-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1056892.
4
Pre-hospital diagnosis and transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction--a decade long experience from one of Europe's largest STEMI networks.急性心肌梗死患者的院前诊断与转运——来自欧洲最大的ST段抬高型心肌梗死网络之一的十年经验
J Electrocardiol. 2013 Nov-Dec;46(6):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Early inter-hospital transfer of patients with myocardial infarction without a doctor, paramedic or nurse on board: results from a French regional emergency care network.心肌梗死患者在无医生、护理人员或护士陪同的情况下早期院间转运:来自法国一个地区急救网络的结果。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0280-z.
6
Reducing Door-in Door-out Intervals in Helicopter ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Interhospital Transfers.缩短直升机转运 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院际转运的门到门时间间隔
Air Med J. 2017 Sep-Oct;36(5):244-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
7
Direct Admission Versus Interhospital Transfer for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.直接入院与院间转运对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 13;10(5):438-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.028. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,在从社区医院转诊的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,实施辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jul;28(7):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.007.
9
Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,比较急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时由医生转运与由患者转运的情况。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Mar 20;121(6):485-91.
10
Assessment of the safety and effectiveness of emergency department STEMI bypass by defibrillation-only emergency medical technicians/primary care paramedics.仅通过除颤急救技术人员/初级护理急救人员评估急诊科ST段抬高型心肌梗死搭桥术的安全性和有效性。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):191-201. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.959226. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Polytraumatized Patients: Challenges and Insights into Air Transfer.多发伤患者的管理:空中转运的挑战与见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 1;13(17):2181. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172181.
2
Safety of helicopter transport in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者直升机转运的安全性。
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2024;94(1):65-70. doi: 10.24875/ACM.23000044.

本文引用的文献

1
Does helicopter transport delay prehospital transfer for STEMI patients in rural areas? Findings from the CRAC France PCI registry.直升机转运是否会延迟农村地区 STEMI 患者的院前转运?来自法国 CRAC PCI 登记处的研究结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):958-965. doi: 10.1177/2048872619848976. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
2
The Impact of Air Transport for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.航空运输对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的影响。
Air Med J. 2019 Mar-Apr;38(2):73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2018.11.008. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Helicopter vs. ground transportation of patients bound for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
直升机与地面交通工具运送拟行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Apr;62(4):568-578. doi: 10.1111/aas.13092. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
4
Reducing Door-in Door-out Intervals in Helicopter ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Interhospital Transfers.缩短直升机转运 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院际转运的门到门时间间隔
Air Med J. 2017 Sep-Oct;36(5):244-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
5
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
6
Relationship between time to invasive assessment and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing an early invasive strategy after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a patient-level analysis of the randomized early routine invasive clinical trials.溶栓后早期侵入性策略治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的侵入性评估时间与临床结局的关系:随机早期常规侵入性临床试验的患者水平分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
7
Relationship of the distance between non-PCI hospitals and primary PCI centers, mode of transport, and reperfusion time among ground and air interhospital transfers using NCDR's ACTION Registry-GWTG: a report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program.利用 NCDR 的 ACTION 注册-GWTG 研究:美国心脏协会生命线计划的报告,探讨非 PCI 医院与初级 PCI 中心之间的距离、转运方式和地面与空中医院间转运的再灌注时间之间的关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(6):797-805. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001307. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
8
Air versus ground transport of patients with acute myocardial infarction: experience in a rural-based helicopter medical service.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(4):273-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000149.
9
Implementation of a physician-staffed helicopter: impact on time to primary PCI.实施医生配备的直升机:对首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Aug 22;9(4):477-83. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I4A77.
10
Helicopter transport effectiveness of patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直升机转运患者进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性
Air Med J. 2013 May-Jun;32(3):144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2012.08.007.