Suppr超能文献

小儿面部移植十年经验。

A ten-year experience with pediatric face grafts.

作者信息

Greenhalgh David G, Hinchcliff Katharine, Sen Soman, Palmieri Tina L

机构信息

From the Shriners Hospitals for Children-Northern California, Sacramento; Firefighters Regional Burn Center at University of California, Davis; and Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;34(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a22ea5.

Abstract

The authors reviewed their 10-year experience of performing face grafts in children with burns. They sought to compare different methods for aesthetic outcome and need for reconstruction. In addition, they determined the efficacy of using allograft skin or Integra as temporary covers. They performed a review of 160 pediatric patients who underwent acute facial excision and grafting for burns between 2000 and 2010. Of the 160 patients with a mean age of 5.8 ± 4.8 years, 96 were males. The mean burn size was 39.4 ± 24.61%, of which 36.5 ± 25.4% was third degree. Overall length of stay was 72.1 days, intensive care unit length of stay was 44.2 days, and the mortality rate was 13.75%. Ninety patients had their entire face burned, 42 burned half, 15 burned their foreheads, and seven had other combinations. The interval between injury and grafting was 13.9 ± 13.19 days. Sixty-three percent patients required one face graft, 23% had two, 8% had three, and 6% four or more. For their initial procedure, 105 patients underwent autografting, 28 had allografting, and 23 received Integra. The authors performed a two-stage procedure in 20.4% and a 1-day procedure in 79.6%. Ten patients had a contiguous "U-shaped" graft wrapped around the face. At least partial regrafting was performed in 21.1%. Allograft and Integra were used for massive burns (69.9 ± 14.5%, 62.6 ± 18.3%, respectively). Of these, 39% died, 17% developed an Integra infection, and 43% required regrafting before autografting. Overall, 24.5% of patients underwent facial reconstruction during their first admission, and 57.1% during subsequent admissions. No difference in the rate of reconstructive surgery was noted between patients receiving Integra or autografting. Autografting face burns as an initial, one-stage procedure works well. The "wrap-around" autograft leads to excellent cosmetic results. When there is a shortage of autograft, allograft or Integra are good options but Integra does not reduce the need for reconstructive surgery.

摘要

作者回顾了他们在儿童烧伤患者中进行面部植皮的10年经验。他们试图比较不同方法的美学效果和重建需求。此外,他们还确定了使用同种异体皮肤或Integra作为临时覆盖物的效果。他们对2000年至2010年间接受急性面部烧伤切除和植皮的160例儿科患者进行了回顾。在这160例平均年龄为5.8±4.8岁的患者中,96例为男性。平均烧伤面积为39.4±24.61%,其中三度烧伤为36.5±25.4%。总住院时间为72.1天,重症监护病房住院时间为44.2天,死亡率为13.75%。90例患者全脸烧伤,42例半脸烧伤,15例额头烧伤,7例为其他烧伤组合。受伤至植皮的间隔时间为13.9±13.19天。63%的患者需要进行一次面部植皮,23%的患者需要两次,8%的患者需要三次,6%的患者需要四次或更多次。在初次手术中,105例患者接受了自体植皮,28例接受了同种异体植皮,23例接受了Integra。作者对20.4%的患者采用了两阶段手术,79.6%的患者采用了单日手术。10例患者进行了环绕面部的连续“U形”植皮。21.1%的患者至少进行了部分再次植皮。同种异体皮肤和Integra用于大面积烧伤(分别为69.9±14.5%,62.6±18.3%)。其中,39%的患者死亡,17%的患者发生Integra感染,43%的患者在自体植皮前需要再次植皮。总体而言,24.5%的患者在首次住院期间接受了面部重建,57.1%的患者在随后的住院期间接受了面部重建。接受Integra或自体植皮的患者在重建手术率上没有差异。将自体植皮作为初始的单阶段手术治疗面部烧伤效果良好。“环绕式”自体植皮可带来极佳的美容效果。当自体皮源不足时,同种异体皮肤或Integra是不错的选择,但Integra并不能减少重建手术的需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验