Suppr超能文献

面部烧伤保守治疗与手术治疗的美容及功能效果评估。

Assessment of cosmetic and functional results of conservative versus surgical management of facial burns.

作者信息

Fraulin F O, Illmayer S J, Tredget E E

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation and Surgery, University of Alberta Hospitals, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996 Jan-Feb;17(1):19-29. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199601000-00007.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine whether tangential excision and thick split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) of deep facial burns give a better cosmetic and functional result than conservative management. Forty patients (28 adults, 12 children) treated for facial burns between July 1989 and July 1991 were evaluated in follow-up (mean 18.3 +/- 8.3 months). The patients were categorized into the following groups according to depth and management of their facial burns: (A) healed without surgery in less than 21 days (n = 13), (B) healed without surgery in 21 days or more (n = 11), (C) early debridement and thick STSG in 18 days or less after the burn (n = 6), and (D) delayed debridement and thick STSG in more than 18 days after the burn (n = 10). Facial esthetics were evaluated by use of a modified scar assessment scale [range 0 (normal) to 16 (multiple abnormalities)], and functional problems of the face and neck were evaluated by use of physical examination. Group A patients had a significantly better overall rating on the scar assessment scale (2.1 +/- 2.9) than the patients in the other groups that required more than 21 days to heal, B (8.0 +/- 2.7), C (7.3 +/- 2.9), and D (5.7 +/- 2.5) (p < 0.01, analysis of variance). Also, skin-grafted areas in the surgically treated groups C and D had a significantly better scar rating than wounds that healed spontaneously in group B (5.7 +/- 4.0 vs 8.0 +/- 2.7, p < 0.05; and 5.1 +/- 2.6 vs 8.0 +/- 2.7, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference among groups B, C, and D when the total number of persistent functional problems after treatment were compared. The most common functional problems for these patients were microstomia (17/27) and eyelid ectropion (17/27). Patients with superficial facial burns that heal in less than 21 days appear to heal with generally very acceptable cosmetic and functional results. However, in those patients with deep facial burns that require prolonged periods for spontaneous wound healing, tangential excision of the wound and resurfacing with thick STSG appear to give better cosmetic results than conservative management, with no greater incidence of functional complications.

摘要

本研究旨在确定面部深度烧伤的切线切除及厚中厚皮片移植(STSG)是否比保守治疗能带来更好的美容和功能效果。对1989年7月至1991年7月间接受面部烧伤治疗的40例患者(28例成人,12例儿童)进行了随访评估(平均18.3±8.3个月)。根据面部烧伤的深度和治疗方式,将患者分为以下几组:(A)在21天内未手术而愈合(n = 13);(B)在21天或更长时间未手术而愈合(n = 11);(C)烧伤后18天或更短时间内早期清创并厚植皮(n = 6);(D)烧伤后超过18天延迟清创并厚植皮(n = 10)。采用改良的瘢痕评估量表[范围从0(正常)至16(多种异常)]对面部美学进行评估,通过体格检查对面部和颈部的功能问题进行评估。A组患者在瘢痕评估量表上的总体评分(2.1±2.9)显著优于其他需要超过21天愈合的组,即B组(8.0±2.7)、C组(7.3±2.9)和D组(5.7±2.5)(方差分析,p < 0.01)。此外,手术治疗的C组和D组中植皮区域的瘢痕评分明显优于B组中自行愈合的创面(分别为5.7±4.0对8.0±2.7,p < 0.05;以及5.1±2.6对8.0±2.7,p < 0.05)。比较治疗后持续性功能问题的总数时,B组、C组和D组之间无显著差异。这些患者最常见的功能问题是小口畸形(17/27)和眼睑外翻(17/27)。面部浅度烧伤在21天内愈合的患者,其愈合后的美容和功能效果总体上似乎非常令人满意。然而,对于那些面部深度烧伤且需要较长时间自行愈合创面的患者,伤口的切线切除及厚STSG植皮似乎比保守治疗能带来更好的美容效果,且功能并发症的发生率并未更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验