*Department of Ophthalmology, Policlinico di Monza, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza †Mario Negri Institute, Milan, Italy.
J Glaucoma. 2014 Apr-May;23(4):232-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741afc.
To assess the ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained using GDx-enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue), and that of ganglion cell complex (GCC) scan available on RTVue, to detect glaucoma.
One randomly selected eye of 205 subjects (70 normal, 65 ocular hypertension, and 70 glaucoma) underwent a complete clinical and instrumental examination. RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to assess RNFL thickness and GCC parameters, GDx ECC to assess RNFL thickness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and sensitivity of the RNFL and GCC parameters were calculated at a fixed specificity of 95%, and the diagnostic abilities of the RNFL values obtained using the 2 instruments were compared. We also compared the results obtained in the normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous subjects.
Best GDx RNFL parameter was nerve fiber indicator (NFI) (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 96%); the best RTVue parameters were average (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 90%), inferior-temporal (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 89%), and superior-temporal RNFL thickness (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). There were no significant differences between the 2 devices (P>0.05). Best GCC parameters were focal loss volume (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 91%) and global loss volume (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%).
GDx ECC and RTVue show a very good diagnostic ability to detect glaucoma. Most of the RNFL parameters had high AUCs and sensitivities. The diagnostic validity of GCC was comparable with that of the RNFL parameters, and they may be very useful in detecting RNFL damage.
评估使用 GDx 增强角膜补偿 (ECC) 或谱域光相干断层扫描 (RTVue) 获得的视网膜神经纤维层 (RNFL) 厚度测量以及 RTVue 上的神经节细胞复合体 (GCC) 扫描检测青光眼的能力。
对 205 例患者(70 例正常、65 例高眼压和 70 例青光眼)的一只随机选择的眼睛进行了全面的临床和仪器检查。使用 RTVue 谱域光相干断层扫描评估 RNFL 厚度和 GCC 参数,使用 GDx ECC 评估 RNFL 厚度。计算了在固定特异性为 95%时,RNFL 和 GCC 参数的受试者工作特征曲线 (ROC) 下面积 (AUC) 和敏感性,并比较了这两种仪器获得的 RNFL 值的诊断能力。我们还比较了正常、高眼压和青光眼患者的结果。
最佳 GDx RNFL 参数为神经纤维指标 (NFI) (AUC 0.99,敏感性 96%);最佳 RTVue 参数为平均 (AUC 0.98,敏感性 90%)、下颞 (AUC 0.97,敏感性 89%) 和上颞 RNFL 厚度 (AUC 0.96,敏感性 87%)。两种设备之间没有显著差异 (P>0.05)。最佳 GCC 参数为焦点丢失量 (AUC 0.98,敏感性 91%)和整体丢失量 (AUC 0.96,敏感性 87%)。
GDx ECC 和 RTVue 具有很好的诊断能力来检测青光眼。大多数 RNFL 参数具有较高的 AUC 和敏感性。GCC 的诊断有效性与 RNFL 参数相当,它们可能在检测 RNFL 损伤方面非常有用。