Department of Molecular Biology and INDEGSAL, University of León, Spain.
Andrology. 2013 Sep;1(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00116.x.
Sperm cryopreservation is widely used in clinic for insemination, in vitro fertilization and other procedures such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The assessment after freezing/thawing of spermatozoa viability, motility and sometimes DNA integrity (mainly using fragmentation assays) has been considered enough to guarantee the safety and effectiveness of the technique. However, it is known that, even when fragmentation is absent, a significant DNA damage could be detected in some genome regions. This is particularly important considering that, during the last years, several studies have pointed out the importance of key paternal genes in early embryo development. In this study, using normozoospermic donors, we present a candidate gene approach in which we quantify the number of lesions produced by freezing/thawing over key genes (PRM1, BIK, FSHB, PEG1/MEST, ADD1, ARNT, UBE3A, SNORD116/PWSAS) using quantitative PCR. Our results demonstrated that the cryopreservation protocol used, which is routinely employed in clinic, produced DNA lesions. The genes studied are differentially affected by the process, and genome regions related to Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes were among the most damaged: SNORD116/PWSAS (4.56 ± 1.84 lesions/10 kb) and UBE3A (2.22 ± 1.3 lesions/10 kb). To check if vitrification protocols could reduce these lesions, another experiment was carried out studying some of those genes with higher differences in the first study (FSHB, ADD1, ARNT and SNORD116/PWSAS). The number of lesions was not significantly reduced compared to cryopreservation. These results could be relevant for the selection of the most adequate available cryopreservation protocol in terms of the number of lesions that produced over key genes, when no differences with other traditional techniques for DNA assessment could be detected.
精子冷冻保存广泛应用于临床的授精、体外受精和其他程序,如胞浆内精子注射。冷冻/解冻后精子活力、运动能力,有时还有 DNA 完整性(主要使用碎片分析)的评估已被认为足以保证该技术的安全性和有效性。然而,已知即使不存在碎片,一些基因组区域也可能检测到明显的 DNA 损伤。这一点尤为重要,因为近年来,几项研究指出了关键父系基因在早期胚胎发育中的重要性。在这项研究中,我们使用正常精子供体,提出了一种候选基因方法,其中我们使用定量 PCR 定量测定冷冻/解冻过程中关键基因(PRM1、BIK、FSHB、PEG1/MEST、ADD1、ARNT、UBE3A、SNORD116/PWSAS)产生的损伤数量。我们的研究结果表明,目前临床中常规使用的冷冻保存方案会导致 DNA 损伤。所研究的基因受到该过程的不同影响,与普氏综合征和安格曼综合征相关的基因组区域是受损最严重的区域之一:SNORD116/PWSAS(4.56±1.84 个损伤/10 kb)和 UBE3A(2.22±1.3 个损伤/10 kb)。为了检查玻璃化方案是否可以减少这些损伤,我们进行了另一项实验,研究了第一个研究中差异较大的一些基因(FSHB、ADD1、ARNT 和 SNORD116/PWSAS)。与冷冻保存相比,损伤数量没有显著减少。当无法检测到其他 DNA 评估传统技术的差异时,这些结果可能与选择最合适的现有冷冻保存方案有关,即该方案在关键基因上产生的损伤数量最少。