Department of Computer Science and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1990 Spring;2(2):96-123. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1990.2.2.96.
Neglect dyslexia, a reading impairment acquired as a consequence of brain injury, is traditionally interpreted as a disturbance of selective attention. Patients with neglect dyslexia may ignore the left side of an open book, the beginning words of a line of text, or the beginning letters of a single word. These patients provide a rich but sometimes contradictory source of data regarding the locus of attentional selectivity. We have reconsidered the patient data within the framework of an existing connectionist model of word recognition and spatial attention. We show that the effects of damage to the model resemble the reading impairments observed in neglect dyslexia. In simulation experiments, we account for a broad spectrum of behaviors including the following: (1) when two noncontiguous stimuli are presented simultaneously, the contralesional stimulus is neglected (extinction); (2) explicit instructions to the patient can reduce the severity of neglect; (3) stimulus position in the visual field affects reading performance; (4) words are read much better than pronounceable nonwords; (5) the nature of error responses depends on the morphemic composition of the stimulus; and (6) extinction interacts with lexical knowledge (if two words are presented that form a compound, e.g., COW and BOY, the patient is more likely to report both than in a control condition, e.g., SUN and FLY). The convergence of findings from the neuropsychological research and the computational modeling sheds light on the role of attention in normal visuospatial processing, supporting a hybrid view of attentional selection that has properties of both early and late selection.
忽视阅读障碍,一种由于脑损伤而获得的阅读障碍,传统上被解释为选择性注意的障碍。患有忽视阅读障碍的患者可能会忽略打开的书本的左侧、一行文本的开头单词或单个单词的开头字母。这些患者为注意力选择性的位置提供了丰富但有时相互矛盾的数据来源。我们在现有的单词识别和空间注意的连接主义模型框架内重新考虑了患者的数据。我们表明,模型损伤的影响类似于忽视性阅读障碍中观察到的阅读障碍。在模拟实验中,我们解释了广泛的行为,包括以下几点:(1)当同时呈现两个不连续的刺激时,对侧刺激被忽视(消失);(2)对患者的明确指令可以减轻忽视的严重程度;(3)刺激在视野中的位置会影响阅读表现;(4)单词比可发音的非单词读得好得多;(5)错误反应的性质取决于刺激的词素组成;(6)消失与词汇知识相互作用(如果呈现两个形成复合词的词,例如 COW 和 BOY,患者更有可能报告这两个词,而不是在对照条件下,例如 SUN 和 FLY)。神经心理学研究和计算建模的发现的一致性揭示了注意力在正常视空间处理中的作用,支持了注意力选择的混合观点,这种观点具有早期和晚期选择的特性。