• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日剂量的氨氯地平分割对 24 小时内药物谷浓度和血压控制的影响。

Effects of dividing amlodipine daily doses on trough drug concentrations and blood pressure control over a 24-hour period.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.428. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.428
PMID:23972579
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of hypertension, once-daily administration of long-acting antihypertensive drugs has been recommended for the improvement of treatment adherence; however, it is unclear whether dividing daily doses has the additional benefit of more ideal blood pressure (BP) control over a 24-hour period.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate whether dividing a 10-mg daily dose of amlodipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, is associated with increased trough plasma amlodipine concentrations, reduced arterial stiffness, and improved BP control over a 24-hour period.

METHODS

Outpatients with essential hypertension were included this open-label, 2-period crossover study. The patients were administered amlodipine 10 mg/d in 2 divided doses for 8 weeks. At week 4, blood was collected just before amlodipine administration for the evaluation of trough plasma amlodipine concentrations. At week 8, 24-hour, daytime, nighttime, and early morning BP, as well as arterial stiffness, were measured using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), respectively. In the subsequent study period, amlodipine 10 mg/d was administered once daily, and the same tests were performed at the same timings as in period 1.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled (7 men, 3 women; mean age, 61.0 [15.3] years). Mean 24-hour BP with twice-daily administration was not significantly lower than that with once-daily administration (129.7 [7.3]/80.1 [7.9] mm Hg vs 130.5 [11.8]/80.1 [7.9] mm Hg, respectively). Similarly, there were no significant differences in daytime, nighttime, or early morning BP between twice- and once-daily administration. In addition, the differences in trough plasma amlodipine concentrations (22.37 [7.66] ng/mL vs 20.57 [8.22] ng/mL) and CAVI values (8.2 [1.8] vs 8.5 [1.0]) were not significantly different between twice- and once-daily administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Administering amlodipine in 2 divided doses was not associated with increased trough plasma amlodipine concentrations, reduced arterial stiffness, or improved BP control over a 24-hour period in patients with essential hypertension.

摘要

背景

在高血压治疗中,建议使用每日一次的长效降压药物来提高治疗依从性;然而,目前尚不清楚将每日剂量分为两次是否会对 24 小时内的血压控制有更好的效果。

目的

本研究旨在探讨将 10mg 氨氯地平(一种长效钙通道阻滞剂)的每日剂量分为两次给药是否会增加谷浓度、降低动脉僵硬度并改善 24 小时内的血压控制。

方法

本开放标签、2 期交叉研究纳入了门诊高血压患者。患者接受氨氯地平 10mg 每日 2 次治疗 8 周。第 4 周,在氨氯地平给药前采集血样以评估谷浓度。第 8 周,使用动态血压监测(ABPM)和心踝血管指数(CAVI)分别测量 24 小时、白天、夜间和清晨血压以及动脉僵硬度。在随后的研究期间,患者每天服用氨氯地平 10mg,在与第 1 期相同的时间进行相同的测试。

结果

共纳入 10 名患者(7 名男性,3 名女性;平均年龄 61.0[15.3]岁)。每日两次给药的 24 小时血压与每日一次给药相比没有显著降低(129.7[7.3]/80.1[7.9]mmHg 与 130.5[11.8]/80.1[7.9]mmHg,分别)。同样,两次与一次给药之间的白天、夜间或清晨血压也没有显著差异。此外,两次与一次给药之间的谷浓度(22.37[7.66]ng/mL 与 20.57[8.22]ng/mL)和 CAVI 值(8.2[1.8]与 8.5[1.0])差异也没有统计学意义。

结论

在原发性高血压患者中,将氨氯地平分为两次给药不会增加谷浓度、降低动脉僵硬度或改善 24 小时内的血压控制。

相似文献

1
Effects of dividing amlodipine daily doses on trough drug concentrations and blood pressure control over a 24-hour period.每日剂量的氨氯地平分割对 24 小时内药物谷浓度和血压控制的影响。
Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.428. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
2
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
3
Effects of combination olmesartan medoxomil plus azelnidipine versus monotherapy with either agent on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and pulse rate in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: additional results from the REZALT study.奥美沙坦酯与阿折地平联合治疗与单药治疗对日本原发性高血压患者 24 小时动态血压和脉搏率的影响:REZALT 研究的附加结果。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):861-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.020.
4
Intra-arterial monitoring of the antihypertensive effects of once-daily amlodipine.一日一次氨氯地平降压效果的动脉内监测
J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Dec;6 Suppl 1:S9-12.
5
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
6
Ambulatory blood pressure response to once-daily fimasartan: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, parallel-group study in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.每日一次非那沙坦的动态血压反应:一项为期 8 周、多中心、随机、双盲、阳性对照、平行分组研究,纳入韩国轻至中度原发性高血压患者。
Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1337-49. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
A comparative study for the effects of nifedipine GITS and amlodipine besylate administrated in daytime or at nighttime on recovery of blood pressure rhythm and arterial stiffness in the young and middle-aged subjects with non-dipper hypertension (NARRAS): Design and rationale.硝苯地平控释片和苯磺酸氨氯地平在白天或夜间给药对非杓型高血压中青年患者血压节律恢复和动脉僵硬度的影响的对比研究(NARRAS):设计和原理。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Dec;74(12):e13628. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13628. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
9
Fixed-Dose Triple Combination of Antihypertensive Drugs Improves Blood Pressure Control: From Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice.固定剂量三联抗高血压药物组合可改善血压控制:从临床试验到临床实践。
Adv Ther. 2017 Apr;34(4):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0511-1. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
Compliance and antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine compared with nifedipine slow-release.氨氯地平与硝苯地平缓释片相比的依从性和降压疗效。
Am J Hypertens. 1998 Apr;11(4 Pt 1):478-86. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00485-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of intrinsic genes across general hypertension, hypertension with left ventricular remodeling, and uncontrolled hypertension.在原发性高血压、伴有左心室重构的高血压和未控制的高血压中识别内在基因。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 6;9:992284. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.992284. eCollection 2022.