Suppr超能文献

在接受结直肠癌筛查的医生建议方面的黑白差异以及未进行筛查的原因。

Black white disparities in receiving a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening and reasons for not undergoing screening.

作者信息

Coleman Wallace Debbie A, Baltrus Peter T, Wallace Tracey C, Blumenthal Daniel S, Rust George S

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 Aug;24(3):1115-24. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0132.

Abstract

There is consensus that all adults over 50 years of age, regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity, should receive a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Disparities in CRC screening result in poorer health outcomes for blacks than for whites. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are black-white differences in receiving a physician recommendation for CRC screening and reasons for undergoing screening. With 12,729 U.S. adults ages 50 to 74 included in the analysis, Whites were more likely than blacks to report receiving a physician recommendation for CRC screening. Based on age-adjusted odds ratio, one out of three blacks were less likely to report receiving a CRC screening recommendation from their physician (OR=0.68, 95% CI 0.57,0.81). This association persisted after adjusting for socioeconomic and other health-related factors (OR=0.61; 95% CI 0.53,0.71). This study suggests that additional steps need to be taken to reduce cancer health disparities.

摘要

人们普遍认为,所有50岁以上的成年人,无论性别、种族或民族,都应该接受医生关于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的建议。CRC筛查方面的差异导致黑人的健康结果比白人更差。本研究的目的是确定在接受医生关于CRC筛查的建议以及进行筛查的原因方面,黑人和白人之间是否存在差异。纳入分析的12729名年龄在50至74岁之间的美国成年人中,白人比黑人更有可能报告接受了医生关于CRC筛查的建议。根据年龄调整后的优势比,三分之一的黑人报告从医生那里获得CRC筛查建议的可能性较小(OR=0.68,95%CI 0.57,0.81)。在调整社会经济和其他与健康相关的因素后,这种关联仍然存在(OR=0.61;95%CI 0.53,0.71)。这项研究表明,需要采取更多措施来减少癌症健康差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Using Human-Centered Design Tools to Improve Health Justice.运用以人为本的设计工具促进健康公平。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Apr;16(2):136-139. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00668.1. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
10
Bias Issues in Colorectal Cancer Management: A Review.结直肠癌管理中的偏见问题:综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2166-2173. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10232-6. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

6
Prejudice and the medical profession: a five-year update.偏见与医学职业:五年更新
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Spring;37(1):118-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00356.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验