Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
BMJ. 2013 Aug 23;347:f5061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5061.
To evaluate risk factors for severe outcomes in patients with seasonal and pandemic influenza.
Systematic review.
Observational studies reporting on risk factor-outcome combinations of interest in participants with influenza. Outcomes included death, ventilator support, admission to hospital, admission to an intensive care unit, pneumonia, and composite outcomes.
Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to March 2011.
Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the risk of bias. GRADE framework to evaluate the quality of evidence.
63 537 articles were identified of which 234 with a total of 610 782 participants met the inclusion criteria. The evidence supporting risk factors for severe outcomes of influenza ranged from being limited to absent. This was particularly relevant for the relative lack of data for non-2009 H1N1 pandemics and for seasonal influenza studies. Limitations in the published literature included lack of power and lack of adjustment for confounders was widespread: adjusted risk estimates were provided for only 5% of risk factor-outcome comparisons in 39 of 260 (15%) studies. The level of evidence was low for "any risk factor" (odds ratio for mortality 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.90 to 4.05 for pandemic influenza and 2.04, 1.74 to 2.39 for seasonal influenza), obesity (2.74, 1.56 to 4.80 and 30.1, 1.74 to 2.39), cardiovascular diseases (2.92, 1.76 to 4.86 and 1.97, 1.06 to 3.67), and neuromuscular disease (2.68, 1.91 to 3.75 and 3.21, 1.84 to 5.58). The level of evidence was very low for all other risk factors. Some well accepted risk factors such as pregnancy and belonging to an ethnic minority group could not be identified as risk factors. In contrast, women who were less than four weeks post partum had a significantly increased risk of death from pandemic influenza (4.43, 1.24 to 15.81).
The level of evidence to support risk factors for influenza related complications is low and some well accepted risk factors, including pregnancy and ethnicity, could not be confirmed as risks. Rigorous and adequately powered studies are needed.
评估季节性流感和大流行性流感患者发生严重结局的危险因素。
系统评价。
报告流感患者感兴趣的危险因素-结局组合的观察性研究。结局包括死亡、呼吸机支持、住院、入住重症监护病房、肺炎以及复合结局。
Medline、Embase、CINAHL、全球卫生以及 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库至 2011 年 3 月。
纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。GRADE 框架评估证据质量。
共确定了 63537 篇文章,其中 234 篇共 610782 名参与者符合纳入标准。支持流感严重结局危险因素的证据有限或缺失。这在很大程度上与缺乏非 2009 H1N1 大流行和季节性流感研究的数据有关。发表文献中的局限性包括缺乏效力和广泛缺乏对混杂因素的调整:只有 39 项(15%)研究中的 260 项(15%)危险因素-结局比较提供了调整风险估计。对于“任何危险因素”(大流行性流感的死亡率比值比为 2.77,95%置信区间为 1.90 至 4.05,季节性流感为 2.04,1.74 至 2.39)、肥胖症(2.74,1.56 至 4.80 和 30.1,1.74 至 2.39)、心血管疾病(2.92,1.76 至 4.86 和 1.97,1.06 至 3.67)和神经肌肉疾病(2.68,1.91 至 3.75 和 3.21,1.84 至 5.58),证据水平较低。对于所有其他危险因素,证据水平均非常低。一些公认的危险因素,如妊娠和属于少数民族群体,不能被确定为危险因素。相比之下,分娩后不到四周的女性死于大流行性流感的风险显著增加(4.43,1.24 至 15.81)。
支持流感相关并发症危险因素的证据水平较低,一些公认的危险因素,包括妊娠和种族,不能被确认为危险因素。需要进行严格和充分效力的研究。