Drew Stefanie A, Borsting Eric, Escobar Amy E, Liu Chunming, Castellanos Efrain, Chase Chris
*PhD †OD, FAAO ‡OD, PhD §OD, MS ∥PhD, FAAO California State University, Northridge, Northridge, California (SAD); Southern California College of Optometry, Fullerton, California (EB); 2U, Inc., Landover, Maryland (AEE); and College of Optometry, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California (CL, EC, CC).
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;90(10):1149-55. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000006.
Several surveys exist to determine the severity and frequency of chronic symptoms related to visual discomfort. To our knowledge, there are no studies that investigate the potential of chronic visual discomfort ratings to predict acute discomfort symptoms that are experienced after tests of accommodation and vergence. We examined the ability of two measures of chronic visual discomfort symptoms to predict acute symptoms experienced.
The Conlon et al. and the convergence insufficiency symptom surveys were administered to 40 participants to assess chronic visual discomfort symptoms. Two measures were used to assess acute symptoms. The first consisted of four Likert-scaled questions relating to comfort level during last test, visual distortions or movement, discomfort caused by overhead lights, and presence of headache symptoms. These questions were asked before and after binocular examination, and the scores were used to generate a postexamination symptom score. The second measure of acute symptoms consisted of participants rating their general discomfort on a four-point Likert scale after each binocular test, and the ratings were summed to produce a General Symptom Score. Participants were then categorized into a high or low Post-exam symptom group and General symptom group. Data were analyzed with a binary logistic regression to determine whether the chronic surveys could predict acute symptom group classification.
Approximately 75% of predictions were accurate for either chronic symptom survey. Headache, soreness, and eye-related questions were more reliable predictors of symptom acute outcome.
These data suggest that the Conlon and Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) surveys are good predictors of acute symptoms induced during a binocular examination and validate the use of chronic symptom surveys as screening tools for symptomatic binocular dysfunction. Further investigation is required to determine predictability of accommodative or vergence performance.
现有多项调查用于确定与视觉不适相关的慢性症状的严重程度和频率。据我们所知,尚无研究调查慢性视觉不适评分预测调节和聚散测试后所经历的急性不适症状的潜力。我们研究了两种慢性视觉不适症状测量方法预测所经历的急性症状的能力。
对40名参与者进行了康伦等人的调查和集合不足症状调查,以评估慢性视觉不适症状。使用两种测量方法评估急性症状。第一种方法包括四个李克特量表问题,涉及上次测试期间的舒适度、视觉扭曲或移动、顶灯引起的不适以及头痛症状的存在。这些问题在双眼检查前后进行询问,分数用于生成检查后症状评分。急性症状的第二种测量方法包括参与者在每次双眼测试后用四点李克特量表对其总体不适进行评分,评分总和得出总体症状评分。然后将参与者分为检查后症状高分组或低分组以及总体症状高分组或低分组。使用二元逻辑回归分析数据,以确定慢性调查是否可以预测急性症状分组。
对于任何一项慢性症状调查,约75%的预测是准确的。头痛、酸痛和与眼睛相关的问题是症状急性结果更可靠的预测指标。
这些数据表明,康伦调查和集合不足症状调查(CISS)是双眼检查期间诱发的急性症状的良好预测指标,并验证了使用慢性症状调查作为有症状双眼功能障碍的筛查工具。需要进一步研究以确定调节或聚散性能的可预测性。