• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生评估慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者功能能力评估期间体力活动的可靠性。

Reliability of clinician rated physical effort determination during functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

机构信息

Department of Work Rehabilitation, Rehaklinik Bellikon, Suva Care, 5454, Bellikon, Switzerland,

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9470-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-013-9470-9
PMID:23975060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4000417/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Functional capacity evaluation (FCE) can be used to make clinical decisions regarding fitness-for-work. During FCE the evaluator attempts to assess the amount of physical effort of the patient. The aim of this study is to analyze the reliability of physical effort determination using observational criteria during FCE.

METHODS

Twenty-one raters assessed physical effort in 18 video-recorded FCE tests independently on two occasions, 10 months apart. Physical effort was rated on a categorical four-point physical effort determination scale (PED) based on the Isernhagen criteria, and a dichotomous submaximal effort determination scale (SED). Cohen's Kappa, squared weighted Kappa and % agreement were calculated.

RESULTS

Kappa values for intra-rater reliability of PED and SED for all FCE tests were 0.49 and 0.68 respectively. Kappa values for inter-rater reliability of PED for all FCE tests in the first and the second session were 0.51, and 0.72, and for SED Kappa values were 0.68 and 0.77 respectively. The inter-rater reliability of PED ranged from κ = 0.02 to κ = 0.99 between FCE tests. Acceptable reliability scores (κ > 0.60, agreement ≥80 %) for each FCE test were observed in 38 % of scores for PED and 67 % for SED. On average material handling tests had a higher reliability than postural tolerance and ambulatory tests.

CONCLUSION

Dichotomous ratings of submaximal effort are more reliable than categorical criteria to determine physical effort in FCE tests. Regular education and training may improve the reliability of observational criteria for effort determination.

摘要

简介

功能能力评估(FCE)可用于做出与工作能力相关的临床决策。在 FCE 过程中,评估员尝试评估患者的体力活动量。本研究的目的是分析使用 FCE 期间的观察性标准来确定体力活动的可靠性。

方法

21 名评估员在 10 个月的时间间隔内,两次独立评估了 18 个视频记录的 FCE 测试中的体力活动,每次评估均使用基于 Isernhagen 标准的四分类体力活动确定量表(PED)和二分体力活动确定量表(SED)进行评定。计算 Cohen's Kappa、平方加权 Kappa 和 % 一致性。

结果

所有 FCE 测试的 PED 和 SED 的内部评估者可靠性的 Kappa 值分别为 0.49 和 0.68。所有 FCE 测试的第一次和第二次评估的 PED 的评估者间可靠性的 Kappa 值分别为 0.51 和 0.72,SED 的 Kappa 值分别为 0.68 和 0.77。PED 的评估者间可靠性在 FCE 测试之间的范围为 κ=0.02 至 κ=0.99。在 PED 中,每个 FCE 测试的 38%的评分具有可接受的可靠性评分(κ>0.60,一致性≥80%),SED 的评分则为 67%。与姿势耐受和步行测试相比,搬运材料测试的可靠性更高。

结论

在 FCE 测试中,确定体力活动的二分法比分类法更可靠。定期的教育和培训可能会提高努力确定的观察性标准的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Reliability of clinician rated physical effort determination during functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.临床医生评估慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者功能能力评估期间体力活动的可靠性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9470-9.
2
Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation.工作相关活动评估之体力操作部分的组内和组间信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(19-20):1797-804. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.548896. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
3
Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛患者中Isernhagen工作系统功能能力评估的重测信度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2003 Dec;13(4):207-18. doi: 10.1023/a:1026264519996.
4
Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults.健康成年人中Isernhagen工作系统功能能力评估的重测信度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Dec;14(4):295-305. doi: 10.1023/b:joor.0000047431.40598.47.
5
The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.WorkWell系统功能能力评估的可靠性:一项系统综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 27;15:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-106.
6
Influence of Functional Capacity Evaluation on Physician's Assessment of Physical Capacity of Veterans With Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Analysis.功能能力评估对慢性疼痛退伍军人身体能力医生评估的影响:一项回顾性分析。
PM R. 2017 Jul;9(7):652-659. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
7
Comparison of two methods for interpreting lifting performance during functional capacity evaluation.两种方法在功能能力评估中解读举重表现的比较。
Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;92(9):1130-40. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110473. Epub 2012 May 31.
8
An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults.健康成年人中Valpar焦耳功能能力评估的评分者间信度调查。
Work. 2015;53(2):337-45. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152154.
9
Reliability and safety of functional capacity evaluation in patients with whiplash associated disorders.颈背部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的可靠性和安全性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9403-z.
10
The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.在功能能力评估中确定搬运用力水平的可靠性。
Work. 2002;18(1):23-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Ventilatory Responses during Stress Tests in Patients with Chronic Pain: Implications for Therapeutic Interventions.慢性疼痛患者应激测试期间通气反应的比较分析:对治疗干预的启示
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Jul 7;9(3):122. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9030122.
2
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study.不同社会环境下的功能能力评估:一项多国研究的结果。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(1):222-236. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x.
3
Development and Validation of a Pain Behavior Assessment in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛行为评估的开发与验证
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Mar;26(1):103-13. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9593-2.
4
Functional Capacity Evaluation Research: Report from the Second International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting.功能能力评估研究:第二届国际功能能力评估研究会议报告
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Mar;26(1):80-3. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9589-y.
5
The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.WorkWell系统功能能力评估的可靠性:一项系统综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 27;15:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-106.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach.功能能力评估:运动物理方法的原理、程序和效用。
J Occup Rehabil. 1992 Sep;2(3):157-68. doi: 10.1007/BF01077187.
2
Reliability and safety of functional capacity evaluation in patients with whiplash associated disorders.颈背部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的可靠性和安全性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9403-z.
3
Comparison of two methods for interpreting lifting performance during functional capacity evaluation.两种方法在功能能力评估中解读举重表现的比较。
Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;92(9):1130-40. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110473. Epub 2012 May 31.
4
Accuracy of visual estimation in classifying effort during a lifting task.在举重任务中视觉评估分类用力的准确性。
Work. 2011;40(4):445-57. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1256.
5
What is the role of "nonorganic somatic components" in functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain undergoing fitness for work evaluation?在进行工作适应性评估时,慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的功能能力评估中,“非器质性躯体成分”的作用是什么?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 15;37(4):E243-50. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822e6088.
6
Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review.基于绩效的测量指标是否可预测肌肉骨骼疾病患者的工作参与情况?一项系统综述。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Feb;85(2):109-23. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0659-y. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
7
Factors associated with functional capacity test results in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review.与非特异性慢性下腰痛患者功能能力测试结果相关的因素:系统评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Dec;21(4):455-73. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9306-4.
8
Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life.随机对照试验对综合护理以减少慢性下腰痛在工作和私人生活中的残疾。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 16;340:c1035. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1035.
9
Role of physical exercise in low back pain rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial of a three-month exercise program in patients who have completed multidisciplinary rehabilitation.体力活动在腰痛康复中的作用:一项针对已完成多学科康复的患者的为期三个月的运动方案的随机对照试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 20;35(12):1192-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bf1de9.
10
Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims.功能能力评估信息对残疾索赔背景下医生对身体工作能力判断的影响。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Oct;82(9):1087-96. doi: 10.1007/s00420-009-0423-8. Epub 2009 May 21.