Novotný Z, Novák M
Otolaryngologické oddĕlení FN II, Praha.
Cesk Otolaryngol. 1990 Jun;39(3):146-53.
Evaluation of hearing losses for the purpose of granting pensions, for forensic purposes or for claims of damages is very important and it should not be based on a single examination method i.e., sound audiometry, which does not evaluate the entire auditory analyzer and does not fully appreciate the social usability of hearing. Statistical analysis and mutual correlations between monosyllabic audiometry, mixed and 3-4 syllabic audiometry and sound audiometry revealed that evaluation of hearing losses according to Fowler and Sabine correlates least with mixed verbal audiometry, although mixed verbal set-ups are typical for the Czech language as regards the structure and frequency of words. The authors recommended therefore the use of mixed verbal audiometry for the percentage evaluation of hearing losses. The actual proposal with a table of calculated hearing losses will be in a subsequent communication.
为发放抚恤金、用于法医目的或损害赔偿索赔而进行的听力损失评估非常重要，且不应仅基于单一的检查方法，即纯音听力测定法，因为该方法无法评估整个听觉分析器，也不能充分评估听力的社会实用性。对单音节听力测定法、混合及3 - 4音节听力测定法与纯音听力测定法之间的统计分析和相互关联研究表明，根据福勒和萨宾方法进行的听力损失评估与混合言语听力测定法的相关性最小，尽管就捷克语的单词结构和频率而言，混合言语测试设置是典型的。因此，作者建议使用混合言语听力测定法来进行听力损失的百分比评估。带有计算出的听力损失表格的实际提案将在后续通讯中公布。
