• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生参与调查的促进因素和障碍:研究人员的行动呼吁。

Facilitators and barriers to survey participation by physicians: a call to action for researchers.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):279-95. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496426.

DOI:10.1177/0163278713496426
PMID:23975758
Abstract

Surveys of health care providers are a well-established tool for obtaining information about the organization and delivery of care as well as about provider knowledge and attitudes. However, declining response rates to provider surveys are a widely acknowledged concern. Although a number of studies have identified specific methods for increasing response rates in health care provider-and particularly physician-surveys, few have addressed the more fundamental question of what motivates or deters providers from survey participation. We briefly review theoretical perspectives concerning why providers choose to participate in surveys, and what is known about facilitators and barriers to participation. We then describe several research designs (i.e., focus groups, key informant interviews, diary and office workflow studies, surveying the surveyors, and follow-back studies of respondents/nonrespondents) for obtaining empirical data on facilitators and barriers to survey participation, particularly by physicians and medical groups. Researchers must begin to build an evidence base for understanding provider decisions concerning survey participation.

摘要

对医疗保健提供者进行调查是获取有关医疗服务的组织和提供情况以及提供者的知识和态度的重要工具。然而,医疗保健提供者,尤其是医生调查的回应率下降是一个广受关注的问题。尽管许多研究已经确定了提高医疗保健提供者调查回应率的具体方法,但很少有研究涉及到更基本的问题,即是什么促使或阻碍提供者参与调查。我们简要回顾了有关提供者选择参与调查的理论观点,以及关于参与障碍的相关知识。然后,我们描述了几种研究设计(即焦点小组、关键知情人访谈、日记和办公工作流程研究、调查调查员以及对调查对象和非调查对象的跟进研究),以获取有关调查参与的促进因素和障碍的经验数据,特别是针对医生和医疗团队。研究人员必须开始建立一个证据基础,以了解提供者关于调查参与的决策。

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to survey participation by physicians: a call to action for researchers.医生参与调查的促进因素和障碍:研究人员的行动呼吁。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):279-95. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496426.
2
Barriers and facilitators for preventing adverse drug reactions of long latency: a qualitative study.预防迟发性药物不良反应的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2012;24(2):81-94. doi: 10.3233/JRS-2012-0561.
3
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
4
Barriers to participation in mental health research: findings from the Genetics and Psychosis (GAP) Study.参与心理健康研究的障碍:遗传学与精神病学(GAP)研究的结果。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;23(1):31-40. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2010.546777.
5
Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.农村环境中的孕产护理模式:与助产士开展跨专业合作的障碍和特征。
Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
6
Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.通过网络调查临床医生:设计和管理中的当前问题。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):352-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496630.
7
When "no" might not quite mean "no"; the importance of informed and meaningful non-consent: results from a survey of individuals refusing participation in a health-related research project.当“不”可能并不完全意味着“不”时;知情且有意义的不同意的重要性:对拒绝参与健康相关研究项目的个人的调查结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 26;7:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-59.
8
Focus group interviews examining attitudes toward medical research among the Japanese: a qualitative study.焦点小组访谈:一项关于日本人对医学研究态度的定性研究。
Bioethics. 2004 Sep;18(5):448-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00409.x.
9
How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.在对医生进行调查时如何获得出色的回应率。
Fam Pract. 2009 Feb;26(1):65-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn097. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
10
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.

引用本文的文献

1
Teaching Everyone Everywhere All at Once: Leveraging Social Media to Implement a Multisite Fungal Diagnostics Curriculum.一次性向世界各地的所有人传授知识:利用社交媒体实施多地点真菌诊断课程。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 22;10(12):ofad594. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad594. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Survey participation among general practitioners: comparison between teaching physicians and a random sample.全科医生参与调查的情况:教学医生与随机抽样的比较。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05895-z.
3
An Examination of Resident Perspectives on Survey Participation and Methodology: Implications for Educational Practice and Research.
住院医师对调查参与度和方法的观点审视:对教育实践与研究的启示
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Jun;13(3):390-403. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01431.1. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
4
A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.一项关于临床试验入组的医师调查的邮件和电子邮件招募策略的随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x.
5
Research priorities in childhood-onset lupus: results of a multidisciplinary prioritization exercise.儿童发病狼疮的研究重点:多学科优先排序研究的结果。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019 Jul 1;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12969-019-0327-4.
6
Barriers to ultrasound guidance for central venous access: a survey among Dutch intensivists and anaesthesiologists.经胸超声引导中心静脉置管的障碍:荷兰重症医学家和麻醉师的调查。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Dec;33(6):1023-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-00246-z. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
7
Physicians as Mediators of Health Policy: Acceptance of Medicaid in the Context of Buprenorphine Treatment.作为卫生政策调解人的医生:丁丙诺啡治疗背景下对医疗补助计划的接受情况
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan;46(1):151-163. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9629-4.
8
Medical Group Characteristics and the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗集团特征与医疗保险受益人的医疗成本及质量
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4970-4996. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13010. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.测试混合模式设计(邮件和网络)和模式内多次联系尝试(邮件或网络)对临床医生调查反应的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3070-3083. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12827. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
10
Physicians' Decision-making When Implementing Buprenorphine With New Patients: Conjoint Analyses of Data From a Cohort of Current Prescribers.医生在为新患者开处丁丙诺啡时的决策:一项当前处方者队列数据的联合分析。
J Addict Med. 2018 Jan/Feb;12(1):31-39. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000360.