Suppr超能文献

是什么让一个生活事件对孩子造成创伤?DSM 标准 A1 和 A2 的预测价值。

What makes a life event traumatic for a child? The predictive values of DSM-Criteria A1 and A2.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ; De Bascule, Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013 Aug 21;4. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20436. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-Criteria A1 and A2 for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been discussed extensively, with several studies in adults or adolescents supporting the removal of Criterion A2. However, solid research in children is missing.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the DSM-Criteria A1 and A2 in predicting posttraumatic stress in children.

METHOD

A sample of 588 Dutch school children, aged 8-18 years, completed a self-report questionnaire to determine if they met Criteria A1 and/or A2. Their posttraumatic stress response was assessed using the Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale.

RESULTS

The contribution of Criterion A2 to the prediction of posttraumatic stress in children is of greater importance than the contribution of Criterion A1. Children who met Criterion A2 reported significantly higher levels of posttraumatic stress and were nine times more likely to develop probable PTSD than children who did not meet Criterion A2. When Criterion A1 was met, a child was only two times more likely to develop probable PTSD as compared with those where Criterion A1 was not met. Furthermore, the low sensitivity of Criterion A1 suggests that children may regularly develop severe posttraumatic stress in the absence of Criterion A1. The remarkably high negative predictive value of Criterion A2 indicates that if a child does not have a subjective reaction during an event that it is unlikely that he or she will develop PTSD.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to most adult studies, the findings of this study emphasize the significant contribution of Criterion A2 to the prediction of posttraumatic stress in children and raise fundamental questions about the value of the current Criterion A1.

摘要

背景

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)标准 A1 和 A2 已经被广泛讨论过,多项针对成年人或青少年的研究支持删除标准 A2。然而,儿童方面的坚实研究仍然缺失。

目的

本研究评估了 DSM 标准 A1 和 A2 在预测儿童创伤后应激反应中的作用。

方法

一个由 588 名 8-18 岁荷兰在校儿童组成的样本完成了一份自我报告问卷,以确定他们是否符合标准 A1 和/或 A2。使用儿童修订版事件影响量表评估他们的创伤后应激反应。

结果

标准 A2 对儿童创伤后应激反应的预测作用比标准 A1 更为重要。符合标准 A2 的儿童报告的创伤后应激水平显著更高,发展为可能 PTSD 的可能性是不符合标准 A2 的儿童的九倍。当符合标准 A1 时,儿童发展为可能 PTSD 的可能性与不符合标准 A1 的儿童相比仅增加两倍。此外,标准 A1 的低敏感性表明,即使没有标准 A1,儿童也可能经常出现严重的创伤后应激反应。标准 A2 的高阴性预测值表明,如果儿童在事件中没有主观反应,那么他或她不太可能发展为 PTSD。

结论

与大多数成人研究结果不同,本研究的发现强调了标准 A2 在预测儿童创伤后应激反应中的重要贡献,并对当前标准 A1 的价值提出了根本性的质疑。

相似文献

2
The utility of the A1 and A2 criteria in the diagnosis of PTSD.A1和A2标准在创伤后应激障碍诊断中的效用。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Sep;46(9):1062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

6
Choosing the right instruments for psychotrauma related research.为与心理创伤相关的研究选择合适的工具。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Dec 28;6:30585. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.30585. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

3
Considering PTSD for DSM-5. 考虑 PTSD 纳入 DSM-5 。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Sep;28(9):750-69. doi: 10.1002/da.20767. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
5
Posttraumatic stress without trauma in children.儿童创伤后应激障碍而无创伤。
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;167(9):1059-65. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09020178. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
7
Should PTSD Criterion A be retained?创伤后应激障碍诊断标准 A 是否应该保留?
J Trauma Stress. 2009 Oct;22(5):374-83. doi: 10.1002/jts.20436. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
8
Epidemiology of child traumatic stress.儿童创伤应激的流行病学
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2009 Aug;11(4):289-95. doi: 10.1007/s11920-009-0042-9.
10
The utility of the A1 and A2 criteria in the diagnosis of PTSD.A1和A2标准在创伤后应激障碍诊断中的效用。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Sep;46(9):1062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Jun 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验