Karagianni Anna E, Kapetanovic Ronan, McGorum Bruce C, Hume David A, Pirie Scott R
The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013 Oct 1;155(4):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
Alveolar macrophages (AMs) constitute the first line of defence in the lung of all species, playing a crucial role in the regulation of immune responses to inhaled pathogens. A detailed understanding of the function and phenotype of AMs is a necessary pre-requisite to both elucidating their role in preventing opportunistic bacterial colonisation of the lower respiratory tract and developing appropriate preventative strategies. The purpose of the study was to characterise this important innate immune cell at the tissue level by making functional and phenotypic comparisons with peritoneal macrophages (PMs). We hypothesised that the tissue of origin determines a unique phenotype of AMs, which may constitute an appropriate therapeutic target for certain equine respiratory diseases. Macrophages isolated from the lung and the peritoneal cavity of 9 horses were stimulated with various toll like receptor (TLR) ligands and the production of nitrite, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin (IL) 10 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) were measured by the Griess reaction and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and/or quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. Cells were also compared on the basis of phagocytic-capacity and the expression of several cell surface markers. AMs, but not PMs, demonstrated increased TNFα release following stimulation with LPS, polyinosinic polycytidylic acid (Poly IC) and heat-killed Salmonella typhinurium and increased TNFα and IDO mRNA expression when stimulated with LPS. AMs showed high expression of the specific macrophage markers cluster of differentiation (CD) 14, CD163 and TLR4, whereas PMs showed high expression of TLR4 only. AMs, but not PMs, demonstrated efficient phagocytic activity. Our results demonstrate that AMs are more active than PMs when stimulated with various pro-inflammatory ligands, thus supporting the importance of the local microenvironment in the activation status of the macrophage. This information provides a valuable knowledge base on which to improve our understanding of the role of macrophages and their microenvironment in equine innate immunity.
肺泡巨噬细胞(AMs)是所有物种肺部防御的第一道防线,在调节对吸入病原体的免疫反应中发挥关键作用。详细了解AMs的功能和表型是阐明其在预防下呼吸道机会性细菌定植中的作用以及制定适当预防策略的必要前提。本研究的目的是通过与腹腔巨噬细胞(PMs)进行功能和表型比较,在组织水平上对这种重要的固有免疫细胞进行特征描述。我们假设细胞来源的组织决定了AMs的独特表型,这可能构成某些马呼吸道疾病的合适治疗靶点。从9匹马的肺和腹腔中分离出的巨噬细胞用各种Toll样受体(TLR)配体进行刺激,分别通过格里斯反应、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和/或定量聚合酶链反应测量亚硝酸盐、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)、白细胞介素(IL)10和吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶(IDO)的产生。还根据吞噬能力和几种细胞表面标志物的表达对细胞进行比较。AMs在用脂多糖(LPS)、聚肌苷酸胞苷酸(Poly IC)和热灭活鼠伤寒沙门氏菌刺激后显示TNFα释放增加,在用LPS刺激时TNFα和IDO mRNA表达增加,而PMs则无此现象。AMs显示出特异性巨噬细胞标志物分化簇(CD)14、CD163和TLR4的高表达,而PMs仅显示TLR4的高表达。AMs表现出有效的吞噬活性,而PMs则没有。我们的结果表明,在用各种促炎配体刺激时,AMs比PMs更活跃,从而支持了局部微环境在巨噬细胞激活状态中的重要性。这些信息为增进我们对巨噬细胞及其微环境在马固有免疫中的作用的理解提供了宝贵的知识库。