Xu H-B, Jiang R-H, Li L
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China,
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;33(3):347-58. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1962-1. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
To evaluate the existing evidence regarding treatment regimens for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), a systematic review of the available therapeutic studies was conducted to assess treatment outcomes. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess treatment outcomes. Subgroup analyses were also conducted by separating studies based on each characteristic independently. Twenty-eight trials met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed that the estimated pooled treatment success rate for patients with MAC disease was 39 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 38-41 %]. The rates of failure, relapse, death, and default were 27 % (95 % CI 25-29 %), 6 % (95 % CI 5-7 %), 17 % (95 % CI 15-18 %), and 12 % (95 % CI 11-13 %), respectively. The proportion of patients treated successfully did not differ significantly on the basis of the study characteristics. However, studies with treatment regimens containing macrolides had significantly higher pooled success proportions (42 %, 95 % CI 40-44 %) than that of other studies (28 %, 95 % CI 24-32 %). Substantial heterogeneity in the study characteristics prevented more conclusive determination of what factors had the greatest effect on the proportion of patients that achieve treatment success and limited the validity of this analysis. This review underscored the importance of strong patient support and treatment follow-up systems to develop successful MAC treatment programs.
为了评估有关鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)治疗方案的现有证据,我们对可用的治疗研究进行了系统评价,以评估治疗结果。采用随机效应荟萃分析来评估治疗结果。还根据每个特征独立地对研究进行分组,进行亚组分析。28项试验符合纳入标准。我们的荟萃分析表明,MAC病患者的估计综合治疗成功率为39%[95%置信区间(CI)38 - 41%]。失败、复发、死亡和违约率分别为27%(95%CI 25 - 29%)、6%(95%CI 5 - 7%)、17%(95%CI 15 - 18%)和12%(95%CI 11 - 13%)。根据研究特征,成功治疗的患者比例没有显著差异。然而,含有大环内酯类的治疗方案的研究的综合成功比例(42%,95%CI 40 - 44%)显著高于其他研究(28%,95%CI 24 - 32%)。研究特征的实质性异质性阻碍了更确凿地确定哪些因素对实现治疗成功的患者比例影响最大,并限制了该分析的有效性。本综述强调了强大的患者支持和治疗随访系统对制定成功的MAC治疗方案的重要性。