Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Burn Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):852-9. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12090. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
Burn wound progression is caused by many mechanisms including local tissue hypoperfusion, prolonged inflammation, free radical damage, apoptosis, and necrosis in burn wounds. Autophagy, a homeostatic process by which cells break down their own components, was found to protect against ischemic injury, inflammatory diseases, and apoptosis in some cases. We tested whether rapamycin, an autophagy inducer, could ameliorate burn wound progression and promote wound healing through autophagy enhancement. Using a previously described deep second-degree burn model, we first tested the effects of rapamycin on autophagic response in burn wound tissue. Autophagy levels in wound tissue of treated rats were increased as compared with controls. Furthermore, we found that laser Doppler flowmetry values and Na/K-ATPase activities were markedly higher in the treated wounds. The content of interleukin-8, methane dicarboxylic aldehyde, and myeloperoxidase activity in the wounds of treated rats were much lower than in controls. The apoptotic rates in treated wounds were much lower than controls as determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling assay. Finally, histomorphological analysis showed that burn wound progression in the treatment group was ameliorated. The time to wound reepithelialization was shorter in the treated wounds than controls 22.5 ± 1.4 days vs. 24.8 ± 1.3 days (mean ± standard deviation, p < 0.01).
烧伤创面的进展是由多种机制引起的,包括局部组织低灌注、炎症持续时间延长、自由基损伤、凋亡和坏死。自噬是一种细胞自身成分分解的平衡过程,已被发现可在某些情况下保护缺血损伤、炎症性疾病和凋亡。我们测试了雷帕霉素(一种自噬诱导剂)是否可以通过增强自噬来改善烧伤创面的进展并促进伤口愈合。使用先前描述的深二度烧伤模型,我们首先测试了雷帕霉素对烧伤创面组织中自噬反应的影响。与对照组相比,治疗组创面组织中的自噬水平增加。此外,我们发现治疗组创面的激光多普勒血流计值和 Na/K-ATP 酶活性明显更高。与对照组相比,治疗组创面中白细胞介素-8、甲烷二羧酸醛和髓过氧化物酶活性的含量明显降低。通过末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶介导的缺口末端标记法测定,治疗组创面的凋亡率明显低于对照组。最后,组织形态学分析表明,治疗组烧伤创面的进展得到改善。与对照组相比,治疗组创面的再上皮化时间更短(22.5 ± 1.4 天比 24.8 ± 1.3 天,均值 ± 标准差,p < 0.01)。