增强进行健康筛查的明智选择：一项系统综述
Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review.
作者信息
Biesecker Barbara Bowles, Schwartz Marc D, Marteau Theresa M
机构信息
Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute/NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
出版信息
Am J Health Behav. 2013 May;37(3):351-9. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.3.8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness of health screening interventions aimed at enhancing informed choice.
METHODS
Studies were selected if (1) they were randomized controlled trials conducted between January 1, 2000, and March 30, 2010, (2) participants in one arm underwent a prescreening intervention aimed at improving informed choice, and (3) informed choice was the primary outcome.
RESULTS
Eight studies that met the inclusion criteria involved screening for prostate, colorectal and breast cancer, and diabetes. Five of the 8 prescreening interventions led to greater informed choice.
CONCLUSIONS
With researchers mindful of the limited number of studies, findings were encouraging, but conclusions regarding the most effective ways of facilitating informed choice for screening are at best tentative.
摘要
目的
评估旨在增强明智选择的健康筛查干预措施的有效性。
方法
入选的研究需满足以下条件：（1）为2000年1月1日至2010年3月30日期间开展的随机对照试验；（2）一组参与者接受旨在改善明智选择的预筛查干预；（3）明智选择为主要结局。
结果
八项符合纳入标准的研究涉及前列腺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌及糖尿病筛查。八项预筛查干预措施中有五项带来了更明智的选择。
结论
鉴于研究数量有限，研究人员虽认为研究结果令人鼓舞，但关于促进筛查明智选择的最有效方法的结论充其量只是初步的。
相似文献
1
Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review.增强进行健康筛查的明智选择：一项系统综述
Am J Health Behav. 2013 May;37(3):351-9. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.3.8.
2
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.
3
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
4
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 24(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub2.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物：网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
7
Screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
8
Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer.针对前列腺癌男性患者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 24;2013(12):CD008529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008529.pub3.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤：系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
引用本文的文献
1
Editorial: Social Inequality in Cancer Screening.社论：癌症筛查中的社会不平等
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 28;10:854659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854659. eCollection 2022.
2
Diagnostic tool or screening programme? Asymptomatic testing for SARS-CoV-2 needs clear goals and protocols.诊断工具还是筛查项目？新型冠状病毒无症状检测需要明确的目标和方案。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Feb;1:100002. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100002. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
3
Exome sequencing study in a clinical research setting finds general acceptance of study returning secondary genomic findings with little decisional conflict.外显子组测序研究在临床研究环境中发现，研究结果返回次要基因组发现，普遍被接受，决策冲突较小。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Jun;30(3):766-773. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1367. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Tissue vs Liquid Biopsies for Cancer Detection: Ethical Issues.组织活检与液体活检在癌症检测中的应用：伦理问题。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Dec;16(4):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09944-y. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
What is in a Name? Parent, Professional and Policy-Maker Conceptions of Consent-Related Language in the Context of Newborn Screening.名字里有什么？新生儿筛查背景下父母、专业人士及政策制定者对同意相关用语的理解
Public Health Ethics. 2019 May 4;12(2):158-175. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz003. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.叙事如何影响结直肠癌筛查决策和参与：一个现实主义综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):327-337. doi: 10.1111/hex.12892. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌遗传咨询后降低风险手术意向的预测因素。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):337-346. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby101.
8
Systematically Developing a Web-Based Tailored Intervention Promoting HPV-Vaccination Acceptability Among Mothers of Invited Girls Using Intervention Mapping.运用干预映射法系统开发基于网络的定制干预措施，以提高受邀女孩母亲对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的接受度。
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 28;6:226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00226. eCollection 2018.
9
Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.非侵入性产前检测（NIPT）的范围限制：对产前筛查国际伦理框架的分析及对荷兰专业人士的访谈研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2050-4.
10
Patient-rated importance of key information on screening colonoscopy in Germany: a survey of statutory health insurance members.德国筛查结肠镜检查中关键信息患者重视度的调查：一项针对法定健康保险成员的调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 13;8(7):e019127. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019127.
本文引用的文献
1
A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.一种支持低教育水平成年人进行结直肠癌筛查的决策辅助工具：随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2010 Oct 26;341:c5370. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5370.
2
Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.知情选择邀请对初级保健中糖尿病筛查的影响（DICISION）：随机试验。
BMJ. 2010 May 13;340:c2138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2138.
3
Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.知情选择邀请对初级保健中糖尿病筛查接受率的影响（DICISION）：试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 20;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-63.
4
Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening.一项用于结直肠癌筛查的自我管理决策辅助工具的随机试验。
J Med Screen. 2008;15(2):76-82. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.007110.
5
Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening.2型糖尿病筛查知情选择邀请的评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
6
Informing men about prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial of patient education materials.向男性宣传前列腺癌筛查：患者教育材料的随机对照试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):466-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0466-z.
7
Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women.乳腺钼靶筛查中的知情选择：一项针对70岁女性的决策辅助工具的随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2039-46. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2039.
8
Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity.重新思考决策辅助工具的目标：呼吁概念清晰。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):609-18. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306780. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
9
Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making.关于前列腺癌筛查的患者教育及参与决策
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;5(2):112-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.623.
10
The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.电话定制与印刷品定制对乳房X光检查依从性的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
Zotero 插件