Editorial: Social Inequality in Cancer Screening.
作者信息
Van Hal Guido, Zeeb Hajo, de Koning Harry J
机构信息
Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology (LG), Berlin, Germany.
出版信息
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 28;10:854659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854659. eCollection 2022.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editorial: Social Inequality in Cancer Screening.社论：癌症筛查中的社会不平等
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 28;10:854659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854659. eCollection 2022.
2
Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys.2005 年至 2010 年法国癌症筛查项目社会经济不平等的时间趋势：癌症晴雨表调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e016941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016941.
3
Using self-reported data on the social determinants of health in primary care to identify cancer screening disparities: opportunities and challenges.利用初级保健中自我报告的健康社会决定因素数据来识别癌症筛查差异：机遇与挑战。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 28;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0599-z.
4
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Korea, 2005-2015.2005 - 2015年韩国女性宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查中的社会经济不平等现象
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Nov;59(9):1026-1033. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.9.1026.
5
National organization of uterine cervical cancer screening and social inequality in France.法国子宫颈癌筛查的全国组织与社会不平等。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Sep;29(5):458-465. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000557.
6
Associations of multimorbidity with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening delivery: a cross-sectional study of a nationally representative Japanese sample.多病症与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查提供之间的关联：一项基于全国代表性日本样本的横断面研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;69:101798. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101798. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England.剖析英国结直肠癌筛查接受情况中的社会经济不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;134:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
8
Socioeconomic determinants of cancer screening utilisation in Latin America: A systematic review.拉丁美洲癌症筛查利用的社会经济决定因素：系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225667. eCollection 2019.
9
Factors associated with and socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 15-64 years in Botswana.博茨瓦纳 15-64 岁女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的相关因素及社会经济不平等。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0255581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255581. eCollection 2021.
10
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Korea, 2005-2015: After the Introduction of the National Cancer Screening Program.2005 - 2015年韩国结直肠癌筛查中的社会经济不平等：国家癌症筛查计划实施之后
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Nov;59(9):1034-1040. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.9.1034.
引用本文的文献
1
Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.日本新冠疫情前后癌症筛查参与方面的社会经济不平等趋势。
J Epidemiol. 2025 May 17;35(10):451-9. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20250021.
2
Geographic, socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer at time of diagnosis in England: a population-based evaluation.英国前列腺癌转移在诊断时的地理、社会经济和人口统计学不平等：一项基于人群的评估。
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Apr 1;4(1):e000643. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000643. eCollection 2025.
3
Bridging the gap in cervical cancer screening for underserved communities: MCED and the promise of future technologies.弥合服务不足社区宫颈癌筛查的差距：分子癌症早检及未来技术的前景
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 29;14:1407008. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1407008. eCollection 2024.
4
Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake and Experiences of Black African Immigrant Women in Canada.加拿大黑人非洲移民妇女的宫颈癌筛查参与情况及经历
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2024 Jul 27;11:23333936241266997. doi: 10.1177/23333936241266997. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Socioeconomic Status and Overall Survival Among Patients With Hematological Malignant Neoplasms.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的社会经济地位与总生存率
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e241112. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1112.
6
Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds.在乳腺癌筛查项目中，共同决策是否有用？一项使用焦点小组讨论从具有不同社会经济背景的法国女性中收集证据的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5.
7
Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009-2022.社会经济不平等对胃癌有组织和机会性筛查的影响：来自 2009-2022 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查的结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 9;11:1256525. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256525. eCollection 2023.
8
Incidence of Stomach, Liver, and Colorectal Cancers by Geography and Social Vulnerability Among American Indian and Alaska Native Populations, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民人群按地理位置和社会脆弱性划分的胃癌、肝癌和结直肠癌发病率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 8;193(1):58-74. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad194.
9
Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for colorectal cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2009-2021.社会经济不平等与结直肠癌的有组织和机会性筛查：来自 2009-2021 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查的结果。
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023086. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2023086. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
本文引用的文献
1
Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review.肺癌筛查：针对难以触及人群的综述
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2309-2322. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-525.
2
Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial.40 岁开始进行乳腺 X 线筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响（英国年龄试验）：一项随机对照试验的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30398-3. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
How is informed decision-making about breast cancer screening addressed in Europe? An international survey of 28 countries.在欧洲，如何进行有关乳腺癌筛查的知情决策？对 28 个国家的国际调查。
Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):1017-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.随机试验中 CT 容积筛查降低肺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):503-513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review.欧洲有组织的宫颈癌筛查对宫颈癌死亡率的影响：系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:207-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.013. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Impact of colorectal cancer screening on cancer-specific mortality in Europe: A systematic review.结直肠癌筛查对欧洲癌症特异性死亡率的影响：系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:224-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
Do socioeconomic factors play a role in nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme?社会经济因素是否在弗拉芒结直肠癌筛查计划中阳性粪便免疫化学试验后不遵医嘱进行结肠镜随访中起作用？
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Mar;29(2):119-126. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000533.
8
The role of emotions in cancer patients' decision-making.情绪在癌症患者决策中的作用。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Mar 28;13:914. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.914. eCollection 2019.
9
Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.乳腺 X 线摄影术的获益和危害信息对女性决策的影响：InforMa 随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0214057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214057. eCollection 2019.
10
A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home-based HPV self-sampling test to non- participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program.一项关于向弗拉芒宫颈癌筛查计划中未参与者提供基于家庭的 HPV 自我采样检测的两种策略的随机对照试验。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):861-868. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31391. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
Zotero 插件