Burton Cynthia Z, Vella Lea, Twamley Elizabeth W
SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2011 Oct 1;14(4):307-326. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2011.622159.
The impact of limited insight is a crucial consideration in the treatment of individuals with psychiatric illness. In the context of psychosis, both clinical and cognitive insight have been described. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between clinical and cognitive insight and neuropsychological functioning, psychiatric symptom severity, and everyday functioning in patients with a primary psychotic disorder participating in a compensatory cognitive training (CT) intervention. Sixty-nine individuals diagnosed with a primary psychotic disorder were randomized to a 3-month CT intervention or to standard pharmacotherapy, and they completed a comprehensive neuropsychological, clinical, and functional battery at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The CT intervention focused on habit formation and compensatory strategy learning in four domains: prospective memory, attention and vigilance, learning and memory, and problem-solving/cognitive flexibility. At baseline, better clinical insight was significantly related to better executive functioning and less severe negative symptoms. There was no significant association between cognitive insight and cognitive functioning, symptom severity, or everyday functioning ability. The CT intervention did not have an effect on clinical or cognitive insight, but better cognitive insight prior to participation in CT significantly predicted decreased positive and depressive symptom severity posttreatment, and better clinical insight predicted improved self-reported quality of life. Although clinical insight is related to executive functioning, the correlates of cognitive insight remain elusive. Intact insight appears to be beneficial in ameliorating clinical symptomatology like positive symptoms and depression, rather than augmenting cognition. It may be valuable to develop brief interventions aimed at improving clinical and cognitive insight prior to other psychosocial rehabilitation in order to maximize the benefit of treatment.
领悟受限的影响是治疗精神疾病患者时的一个关键考量因素。在精神病的背景下,临床领悟和认知领悟均有相关描述。本研究旨在评估参与代偿性认知训练(CT)干预的原发性精神障碍患者的临床领悟与认知领悟之间的关系,以及它们与神经心理功能、精神症状严重程度和日常功能之间的关系。69名被诊断为原发性精神障碍的个体被随机分为接受为期3个月的CT干预组或标准药物治疗组,他们在基线、3个月和6个月时完成了全面的神经心理、临床和功能测评。CT干预聚焦于四个领域的习惯形成和代偿策略学习:前瞻性记忆、注意力和警觉性、学习和记忆以及解决问题/认知灵活性。在基线时,更好的临床领悟与更好的执行功能以及不那么严重的阴性症状显著相关。认知领悟与认知功能、症状严重程度或日常功能能力之间没有显著关联。CT干预对临床或认知领悟没有影响,但参与CT之前更好的认知领悟显著预测了治疗后阳性和抑郁症状严重程度的降低,而更好的临床领悟则预测了自我报告的生活质量的改善。尽管临床领悟与执行功能有关,但认知领悟的相关因素仍不明确。完整的领悟似乎有助于改善如阳性症状和抑郁等临床症状,而非增强认知。在进行其他心理社会康复之前,开发旨在改善临床和认知领悟的简短干预措施可能是有价值的,以便使治疗效益最大化。