Cooley R L, McCourt J W, Huddleston A M, Casmedes H P
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
Pediatr Dent. 1990 Feb;12(1):38-42.
A fluoride-containing sealant (FluroShield) was evaluated in vitro and compared to a sealant without fluoride (Helio-Seal). Both materials were applied to the occlusal surface of extracted teeth and microscopically evaluated for their ability to penetrate pits and fissures. Additional specimens were subjected to dye immersion and evaluated for resistance to microleakage. Disc-shaped samples of the fluoride-containing sealant were immersed in distilled water and analyzed daily for seven days for fluoride release. All specimens of FluroShield released fluoride during the evaluation period, but there were differences between the materials in resistance to microleakage.
对一种含氟封闭剂(氟护盾)进行了体外评估,并与不含氟的封闭剂(日进封闭剂)进行了比较。将两种材料都应用于拔除牙齿的咬合面,并通过显微镜评估它们渗透窝沟的能力。另外的标本进行染料浸入试验,并评估其抗微渗漏能力。将含氟封闭剂的圆盘形样本浸入蒸馏水中,连续七天每天分析其氟释放情况。在评估期间,所有氟护盾标本都释放了氟,但两种材料在抗微渗漏方面存在差异。