Ranger Jochen, Kuhn Jörg-Tobias
Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Nov;67(3):388-407. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12025. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
Latent trait models for responses and response times in tests often lack a substantial interpretation in terms of a cognitive process model. This is a drawback because process models are helpful in clarifying the meaning of the latent traits. In the present paper, a new model for responses and response times in tests is presented. The model is based on the proportional hazards model for competing risks. Two processes are assumed, one reflecting the increase in knowledge and the second the tendency to discontinue. The processes can be characterized by two proportional hazards models whose baseline hazard functions correspond to the temporary increase in knowledge and discouragement. The model can be calibrated with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and an application of the ECM algorithm. Two tests of model fit are proposed. The amenability of the proposed approaches to model calibration and model evaluation is demonstrated in a simulation study. Finally, the model is used for the analysis of two empirical data sets.
测试中反应和反应时间的潜在特质模型通常缺乏从认知过程模型角度的实质性解释。这是一个缺点,因为过程模型有助于阐明潜在特质的含义。在本文中,提出了一种用于测试中反应和反应时间的新模型。该模型基于竞争风险的比例风险模型。假设了两个过程,一个反映知识的增加,另一个反映停止的倾向。这些过程可以由两个比例风险模型来表征,其基线风险函数分别对应于知识的暂时增加和气馁。该模型可以通过边际最大似然估计和ECM算法的应用进行校准。提出了两种模型拟合检验。在模拟研究中证明了所提出方法对模型校准和模型评估的适用性。最后,该模型用于分析两个实证数据集。