• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新时代:最新款软性输尿管镜的性能与局限性。

A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.022
PMID:23992972
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To comparatively study 3 of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes using both subjective and objective parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three models of flexible ureteroscopes (Karl Storz Flex-Xc, Olympus URF-Vo, and Wolf Cobra) were evaluated during 90 procedures. For each model, 20 procedures were therapeutic for pyelocaliceal lithiasis and 10 were diagnostic. The maneuverability and visibility were scored and compared, and the irrigation flow and maximal deflection were measured in an ex vivo setting, with an empty working channel and with accessory instruments in place. Instrument durability was also reviewed.

RESULTS

All models demonstrated good maneuverability, with a slight advantage for the Flex-Xc. During the diagnostic procedures, failure to access the entire pyelocaliceal system occurred in 2 cases with the URF-Vo, both because of a thin caliceal infundibulum, and in 1 case with the Cobra, because of complex caliceal architecture. Regarding visibility, although the performance of the digital models was relatively similar, the fiberoptic Cobra achieved a lower score. Loss of deflection and irrigation when using the various ancillary instruments was similar for all 3 endoscopes, but the Cobra offered supplementary flow through a secondary channel. The mean deflection loss was 5% for the URF-Vo, 9% for the Flex-Xc, and 10% for the Cobra. The visual quality of the 2 digital models remained unchanged during the study; however, in the fiberoptic ureteroscope, 58 optic fibers were broken.

CONCLUSION

The latest models of flexible ureteroscopes have proved to be effective instruments for upper urinary tract endoscopic interventions. There is still room for improvement, already made possible by the technological advances.

摘要

目的

通过主观和客观参数比较研究 3 种最新的软性输尿管镜。

材料和方法

在 90 例手术中评估了 3 种软性输尿管镜(Karl Storz Flex-Xc、Olympus URF-Vo 和 Wolf Cobra)。对于每种型号,20 例为肾盂肾盏结石的治疗性手术,10 例为诊断性手术。对其可操作性和可视性进行评分和比较,并在离体环境下测量冲洗流量和最大偏转度,此时工作通道为空且有附件器械。还检查了器械的耐用性。

结果

所有模型均表现出良好的可操作性,Flex-Xc 略占优势。在诊断性手术中,URF-Vo 有 2 例因肾盂漏斗部较细而无法进入整个肾盂肾盏系统,Cobra 有 1 例因肾盂结构复杂而无法进入。关于可视性,尽管数字模型的性能相对相似,但纤维光学 Cobra 的得分较低。使用各种辅助器械时,偏转和冲洗的丢失在 3 种输尿管镜中相似,但 Cobra 通过第二通道提供额外的流量。URF-Vo 的平均偏转损失为 5%,Flex-Xc 为 9%,Cobra 为 10%。2 种数字模型的视觉质量在研究过程中保持不变;然而,在纤维光学输尿管镜中,58 根光学纤维断裂。

结论

最新的软性输尿管镜已被证明是上尿路内镜介入的有效工具。仍有改进的空间,技术进步已经使之成为可能。

相似文献

1
A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.新时代:最新款软性输尿管镜的性能与局限性。
Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
2
Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.可弯曲输尿管镜的比较:偏转、灌流及光学特性
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):2017-21. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158139.65771.0a.
3
Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.可弯曲输尿管镜:小于9Fr新型内镜的耐用性和功能的单中心评估
J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1164-8.
4
Conventional fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope versus fourth generation digital flexible ureteroscope: a critical comparison.传统纤维光学软性输尿管镜与第四代数字软性输尿管镜:关键比较
J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):17-21. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0390.
5
Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.新型一次性使用软性输尿管镜的评估。
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):903-907. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0237. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
6
Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study.可弯曲输尿管镜的耐用性:一项随机前瞻性研究。
J Urol. 2006 Jul;176(1):137-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00575-1.
7
Comparison of optics and performance of single channel and a novel dual-channel fiberoptic ureteroscope.单通道与新型双通道光纤输尿管镜的光学及性能比较
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.032.
8
Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.哪种软性输尿管镜(数字式与光纤式)能够轻松抵达困难的下极肾盏并具有更好的尖端偏转:在K-Box上的体外研究。一项PETRA评估。
J Endourol. 2017 Jul;31(7):630-637. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0109. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
9
Performance and durability of leading flexible ureteroscopes.领先的软性输尿管镜的性能与耐用性。
J Endourol. 2004 Oct;18(8):735-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.735.
10
Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.新型一次性使用数字柔性输尿管镜与非一次性使用纤维光学和数字输尿管镜在尸体模型中的比较。
J Endourol. 2016 Jun;30(6):655-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0051. Epub 2016 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Illumination matters part IV: blackout and whiteout in flexible ureteroscopy - first report on a phenomenon observed by PEARLS.照明的重要性第四部分:软性输尿管镜检查中的盲区和全盲区——PEARLS 观察到的一种现象的首次报告。
World J Urol. 2024 May 5;42(1):294. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04988-1.
2
How to evaluate a flexible ureterorenoscope? Systematic mapping of existing evaluation methods.如何评估软性输尿管镜?现有评估方法的系统综述。
BJU Int. 2021 Oct;128(4):408-423. doi: 10.1111/bju.15544. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
3
[Chinese Expert Consensus Statement on Clinical Evaluation System of Medical Endoscopy].
《医学内镜临床评价体系中国专家共识声明》
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 20;23(6):409-413. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2020.104.10.
4
Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.可重复使用与一次性使用软性输尿管镜的医学经济学比较研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Oct;51(10):1735-1741. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02230-1. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Prospective comparative study between the effect of CIDEX OPA and STERRAD NX on the durability of digital flexible ureteroscope.前瞻性对比研究 CIDEX OPA 和 STERRAD NX 对数字式软性输尿管镜耐用性的影响。
World J Urol. 2020 Mar;38(3):775-781. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02800-z. Epub 2019 May 13.
6
Digital ureteroscopes: technology update.电子输尿管镜:技术更新
Res Rep Urol. 2017 Jan 27;9:19-25. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S104229. eCollection 2017.
7
Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.推动输尿管镜技术的发展:现状与未来展望。
Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jul;11(7):373-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.118. Epub 2014 Jun 3.