• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉斯哥医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)复杂性皮肤和软组织感染治疗的经济学评估

Economic evaluation of treatment for MRSA complicated skin and soft tissue infections in Glasgow hospitals.

作者信息

Seaton R A, Johal S, Coia J E, Reid N, Cooper S, Jones B L

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Unit, Brownlee Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK,

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;33(3):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1956-z. Epub 2013 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10096-013-1956-z
PMID:23995977
Abstract

In the UK, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-associated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are predominantly managed in the hospital using intravenous (IV) glycopeptides. We set out to explore the potential for and relative healthcare costs of earlier hospital discharge through switch to oral antibiotic therapy (linezolid or rifampicin and doxycycline) or continuation of IV therapy (teicoplanin) via an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service. Over 16 months, 173 patients were retrospectively identified with MRSA SSTI, of whom 82.8 % were treated with IV therapy. Thirty-seven patients were potentially suitable for earlier discharge with outpatient therapy. The model assumed 3 days of inpatient management and a maximum of 14 days of outpatient therapy. For the status quo, where patients received only inpatient care with IV therapy, hospital costs were calculated at £12,316 per patient, with 97 % of costs accounted for by direct bed day costs. The mean total cost savings achievable through OPAT or oral therapy was estimated to be £6,136 and £6,159 per patient treated, respectively. A significant proportion of patients with MRSA SSTI may be suitable for outpatient management with either oral therapy or via OPAT, with the potential for significant reduction in healthcare costs.

摘要

在英国,耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)相关的皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)主要在医院通过静脉注射(IV)糖肽类药物进行治疗。我们着手探讨通过改用口服抗生素治疗(利奈唑胺或利福平与多西环素)或通过门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)服务继续静脉治疗(替考拉宁)来实现提前出院的可能性及相关医疗费用。在16个月的时间里,回顾性确定了173例MRSA SSTI患者,其中82.8%接受了静脉治疗。37例患者可能适合通过门诊治疗提前出院。该模型假设住院治疗3天,门诊治疗最多14天。对于现状,即患者仅接受静脉治疗的住院护理,计算得出每位患者的医院费用为12316英镑,其中97%的费用由直接床位日费用构成。估计通过OPAT或口服治疗每位接受治疗的患者可实现的平均总成本节省分别为6136英镑和6159英镑。相当一部分MRSA SSTI患者可能适合通过口服治疗或OPAT进行门诊管理,有可能大幅降低医疗费用。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of treatment for MRSA complicated skin and soft tissue infections in Glasgow hospitals.格拉斯哥医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)复杂性皮肤和软组织感染治疗的经济学评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;33(3):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1956-z. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
2
Antibiotic treatment patterns across Europe in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a plea for implementation of early switch and early discharge criteria.欧洲耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致复杂性皮肤软组织感染患者的抗生素治疗模式:呼吁实施早期转换和早期出院标准。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jul;44(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 16.
3
Role of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in the treatment of community acquired skin and soft tissue infections in Singapore.门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗在新加坡社区获得性皮肤及软组织感染治疗中的作用
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2569-4.
4
Changes in prescriptive practices in skin and soft tissue infections associated with the increased occurrence of community acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.与社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌发生率增加相关的皮肤和软组织感染处方实践的变化。
J Infect Public Health. 2013 Dec;6(6):423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
5
A comparison of costs and hospital length of stay associated with intravenous/oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in elderly US patients.美国老年患者中,静脉注射/口服利奈唑胺或静脉注射万古霉素治疗疑似或确诊耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的复杂皮肤和软组织感染的成本及住院时间比较。
Clin Ther. 2007 Mar;29(3):469-77. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(07)80085-3.
6
Risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized patients in Colombia.与哥伦比亚住院患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和软组织感染相关的危险因素。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;87:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
Pharmacoeconomic advantages of oral minocycline for the therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs).口服米诺环素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)的药物经济学优势。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;33(10):1869-71. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2113-z. Epub 2014 May 18.
8
Management and outcome of adults with skin and soft tissue infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary hospital in central Taiwan.中国台湾中部一家三级医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤软组织感染成人患者的管理与结局。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015 Oct;48(5):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
9
Influence of real-world characteristics on outcomes for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal skin and soft tissue infections: a multi-country medical chart review in Europe.现实特征对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和软组织感染患者结局的影响:一项在欧洲多国进行的基于病历的回顾性研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 2;14:476. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-476.
10
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in skin and soft tissue infections presenting to the Emergency Department of a Canadian Academic Health Care Center.加拿大一所学术性医疗保健中心急诊科收治的皮肤及软组织感染中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;18(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328337901a.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical, organizational, and pharmacoeconomic perspectives of dalbavancin vs standard of care in the infectious disease network.达巴万星与传染病网络中标准治疗方案对比的临床、组织及药物经济学视角
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul 29;11(Suppl 2):5-12. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2024.3094. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Phage-Based Biosensing for Rapid and Specific Detection of .基于噬菌体的生物传感用于快速特异性检测…… (原文不完整)
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 17;11(8):2098. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11082098.
3
Cost analysis of dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in two Italian hospitals.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of oral linezolid compared with intravenous vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, case-control analysis.口服利奈唑胺与静脉万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌合并皮肤软组织感染的临床疗效:回顾性、倾向评分匹配、病例对照分析。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1667-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
2
Antibiotic management and early discharge from hospital: an economic analysis.抗生素管理与提前出院:经济分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Sep;67(9):2297-302. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks194. Epub 2012 May 23.
3
在两家意大利医院中,达巴万星与标准治疗方案治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs)的成本分析。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Apr 19;5(2):dlad044. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad044. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Economic burden of skin and skin structure infections due to Gram-positive bacteria in patients on hospital at home-based outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT).居家门诊静脉用抗生素治疗(OPAT)患者中革兰阳性菌所致皮肤和皮肤结构感染的经济负担。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2023 Jun;36(3):291-301. doi: 10.37201/req/134.2022. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
5
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov 6;7:92-100. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2020.2138. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Empiric Treatment of Hospitalized Adults with cSSTI: An Economic Analysis from the Perspective of the Spanish National Health System.头孢洛林酯用于经验性治疗住院成年社区获得性皮肤及软组织感染患者:基于西班牙国家卫生系统视角的经济学分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Mar 18;14:149-161. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S329494. eCollection 2022.
7
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) versus inpatient care in the UK: a health economic assessment for six key diagnoses.英国的门诊患者的肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)与住院治疗:针对六个关键诊断的健康经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 28;11(9):e049733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049733.
8
Cost-analysis of inpatient and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in orthopaedics: A systematic literature review.骨科住院和门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的成本分析:一项系统文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Jul 26;7(14):1825-1836. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i14.1825.
9
Economic features of antibiotic resistance: the case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.抗生素耐药性的经济特征:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的案例
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Apr;33(4):285-325. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0242-y.
10
Antibacterial Treatment of Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: a Cost and Budget Impact Analysis in Greek Hospitals.金黄色葡萄球菌引起的耐甲氧西林皮肤和软组织感染的抗菌治疗:希腊医院的成本和预算影响分析。
Infect Dis Ther. 2014 Dec;3(2):257-68. doi: 10.1007/s40121-014-0044-8. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
Antibiotic stewardship and early discharge from hospital: impact of a structured approach to antimicrobial management.
抗生素管理和提前出院:抗菌药物管理结构化方法的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Sep;67(9):2289-96. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks193. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults in the UK: a consensus statement.英国成人门诊静脉用抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)的良好实践推荐:共识声明。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 May;67(5):1053-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks003. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
5
Factors associated with outcome and duration of therapy in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) patients with skin and soft-tissue infections.门诊静脉用抗生素治疗(OPAT)皮肤软组织感染患者的结局和治疗持续时间的相关因素。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Sep;38(3):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
A European survey of antibiotic management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: current clinical opinion and practice.一项针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的抗生素管理的欧洲调查:当前临床观点和实践。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Mar;16 Suppl 1:3-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03135.x.
7
Efficacy and safety of linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI): a meta-analysis.利奈唑胺治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)合并皮肤软组织感染(cSSTI)的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Feb;26(2):407-21. doi: 10.1185/03007990903454912.
8
Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a UK perspective.门诊静脉用抗生素治疗(OPAT)的临床疗效和成本效益:英国视角。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Dec;64(6):1316-24. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp343. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
9
Development of teicoplanin dosage guidelines for patients treated within an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) programme.制定针对门诊肠外抗生素治疗(OPAT)项目中患者的替考拉宁剂量指南。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Jul;64(1):181-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp147. Epub 2009 May 2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France.法国住院复杂性皮肤及软组织感染患者使用利奈唑胺与万古霉素的成本效益分析
Med Mal Infect. 2009 May;39(5):330-40. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 21.