Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Sociol. 2013 Sep;64(3):453-77. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12027.
This article seeks to understand environmental effects on associational interdependencies, be they competitive or collaborative, in a polarized organizational population. To do so, it builds on the density-dependent model and the ecology of ideologies. Especially interested in the effect of context on density-dependent processes, I compare different Turkish ideological movements in Amsterdam and Berlin. Amsterdam represents an open and supportive environment for such movements, whereas Berlin constitutes a more closed and hostile one. By analysing the founding and disbanding rates of Turkish immigrant organizations in Amsterdam and Berlin during the period 1965-2000, the article demonstrates how the increasing density of Turkish ideologies has affected interdependencies in two main ways: by heightening competition, particularly between ideologically similar organizations, and by increasing counter activities between opposing movements. It also shows that the influence of context is limited. An open environment does not significantly influence the vitality rates of ideologies or further collaboration among or between them. On the contrary, it seemingly increases competition and fragmentation because more resources and opportunities are available. More signs of collaboration and mutualism are found in Berlin's closed environment.
本文旨在探讨在两极分化的组织群体中,环境对竞争或合作的联合依存关系的影响。为此,它以密度依赖模型和意识形态生态学为基础。本文特别关注环境对密度依赖过程的影响,通过比较阿姆斯特丹和柏林的不同土耳其意识形态运动,分析了在 1965 年至 2000 年间,阿姆斯特丹和柏林的土耳其移民组织的成立和解散率。文章展示了随着土耳其意识形态密度的增加,联合依存关系是如何通过加剧竞争(特别是在意识形态相似的组织之间)和增加对立运动之间的对抗活动两种主要方式产生影响的。文章还表明,环境的影响是有限的。开放的环境并不会显著影响意识形态的活力率或它们之间或内部的进一步合作。相反,它似乎会增加竞争和分裂,因为有更多的资源和机会。在柏林封闭的环境中,我们发现了更多的合作和共生的迹象。