Rogers R, Gillis J R, Turner R E, Frise-Smith T
Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Am J Psychiatry. 1990 Oct;147(10):1304-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.10.1304.
In a forensic population, patients with command hallucinations (N = 25) were compared to two groups of psychotic patients: those with noncommand hallucinations (N = 24) and those without hallucinations (N = 16). The three groups did not differ in overall impairment as measured by the Global Assessment Scale and the Social Behavior Rating Schedule. However, the group with command hallucinations differed in the content of their hallucinations (more aggression, dependency, and self-punishment themes), and nearly one-half did not report or denied their command hallucinations to the assessment team. Many patients (N = 11, 44%) reported that they frequently responded to hallucinatory commands with unquestioning obedience.
在一个法医鉴定人群中,将有命令性幻听的患者(N = 25)与两组精神病患者进行了比较:有非命令性幻听的患者(N = 24)和无幻听的患者(N = 16)。根据总体评估量表和社会行为评定量表测量,这三组在整体损伤方面没有差异。然而,有命令性幻听的组在幻听内容上有所不同(更多的攻击、依赖和自我惩罚主题),并且近一半的患者没有向评估团队报告或否认他们的命令性幻听。许多患者(N = 11,44%)报告说,他们经常毫不犹豫地服从幻听命令。