Health Administration Department, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(4):449-78. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2011-0082.
Developing a performance measure and reporting the results to support decision making at an individual level has yielded poor results in many health systems. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the factors associated with the dissemination of performance information that generate and support continuous improvement in health organizations.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A systematic data collection strategy that includes empirical and theoretical research published from 1980 to 2010, both qualitative and quantitative, was performed on Web of Science, Current Contents, EMBASE and MEDLINE. A narrative synthesis method was used to iteratively detail explicative processes that underlie the intervention. A classification and synthesis framework was developed, drawing on knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) literature. The sample consisted of 114 articles, including seven systematic or exhaustive reviews.
Results showed that dissemination in itself is not enough to produce improvement initiatives. Successful dissemination depends on various factors, which influence the way collective actors react to performance information such as the clarity of objectives, the relationships between stakeholders, the system's governance and the available incentives.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This review was limited to the process of knowledge dissemination in health systems and its utilization by users at the health organization level. Issues related to improvement initiatives deserve more attention.
Knowledge dissemination goes beyond better communication and should be considered as carefully as the measurement of performance. Choices pertaining to intervention should be continuously prompted by the concern to support organizational action.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: While considerable attention was paid to the public reporting of performance information, this review sheds some light on a more promising avenue for changes and improvements, notably in public health systems.
在许多卫生系统中,开发一种绩效衡量标准并报告结果以支持个人层面的决策,效果并不理想。本文的目的是强调与绩效信息传播相关的因素,这些因素能够在卫生组织中产生和支持持续改进。
设计/方法/途径:我们在 Web of Science、Current Contents、EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 上采用了一种系统的数据收集策略,包括 1980 年至 2010 年发表的实证和理论研究,包括定性和定量研究。我们使用叙述性综合方法迭代详细说明干预措施背后的解释过程。我们借鉴知识转移和交流(KTE)文献,开发了一个分类和综合框架。样本包括 114 篇文章,其中包括 7 篇系统或详尽的综述。
结果表明,传播本身不足以产生改进措施。成功的传播取决于各种因素,这些因素影响着集体行为者对绩效信息的反应方式,例如目标的明确性、利益相关者之间的关系、系统的治理和可用的激励措施。
研究局限性/影响:本综述仅限于卫生系统中的知识传播过程及其在卫生组织层面的用户利用情况。与改进措施相关的问题值得更多关注。
知识传播不仅仅是更好的沟通,应该像衡量绩效一样仔细考虑。干预措施的选择应该不断受到支持组织行动的关注的推动。
原创性/价值:尽管人们对绩效信息的公开报告给予了相当大的关注,但本综述为变革和改进提供了一个更有前途的途径,特别是在公共卫生系统中。