Australian Catholic University & Mater Medical Research Institute, South Brisbane, Australia.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Sep;34(9):648-57. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2013.804895.
This paper explores the cross-cultural application of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the difficulties associated with administration to women from refugee backgrounds. Assessing women's comprehension of individual scale items identified problems associated with "Western" terminology and concepts. Re-interpretation of discrete items on the scale was often necessary, raising doubts about the objectivity and reliability of scores. Our findings call for a closer examination of the ethnocentric assumptions underpinning the EPDS items, and the need to incorporate a more diverse range of cross-cultural understandings into future iterations.
本文探讨了爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)在跨文化环境中的应用,以及向难民背景的女性施测时所面临的困难。评估女性对量表各个项目的理解,发现了与“西方”术语和概念相关的问题。量表中离散项目的重新解释往往是必要的,这引发了对评分客观性和可靠性的质疑。我们的研究结果呼吁更深入地审视 EPDS 项目背后的种族中心主义假设,并需要将更多样化的跨文化理解纳入未来的修订中。