Colorado Health Outcomes Program, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):529-38. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130048.
Few comparative effectiveness studies of treatment strategies using antihypertensive therapeutic classes in hypertension control have been assessed in a primary care environment. The objectives are to compare the effectiveness of common antihypertensive therapeutic classes initiated as monotherapy and of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), free-equivalent combinations (FECs), and monotherapy on hypertension control.
This article reports observational comparative effectiveness analyses of data electronically extracted from electronic health records. The study population consisted of 8,676 patients with an incident prescription for an antihypertensive agent of a total of 79,176 patients receiving antihypertensive therapy in 33 geographically diverse primary care clinics. The main measures were reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and rates of attaining goals per the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7).
There were small, clinically insignificant differences in blood pressure reductions between the monotherapy classes. Higher rates of blood pressure control were obtained when patients were initiated on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor than a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic (47.8% vs 39.9%) or a β-blocker versus a thiazide (45.9% vs 39.9%). Patients initiated on FDCs had significantly larger reductions in blood pressure than patients initiated on FECs (-17.3 vs -12.0 mm Hg SBP; -10.1 vs -6.0 mm Hg DBP) or monotherapy (-17.3 vs -13.6 mm Hg SBP; -10.1 vs -7.9 mm Hg DBP). Rates of attaining JNC7 goals also were better for FDCs than FECs (57.2% vs 42.5%) and for FDCs versus monotherapy (57.2% vs 44.9%).
Patients initiated on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and β-blockers had slightly higher rates of blood pressure control. The use of FDCs as initial therapy is more effective in the control of hypertension than monotherapy or FECs.
在基层医疗环境中,使用降压治疗类别治疗策略的比较效果研究较少。目的是比较起始单药治疗和固定剂量联合(FDC)、自由等效联合(FEC)以及单药治疗对高血压控制的有效性。
本文报告了从电子健康记录中电子提取数据的观察性比较效果分析。研究人群由 8676 名接受抗高血压治疗的患者组成,共 79176 名患者在 33 个地理位置不同的基层医疗诊所接受抗高血压治疗。主要措施是收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的降低以及根据第七次美国联合委员会预防、检测、评估和治疗高血压报告(JNC7)达到目标的比例。
单药治疗类别之间的血压降低差异较小,无临床意义。与噻嗪类或噻嗪样利尿剂(47.8%比 39.9%)或β受体阻滞剂与噻嗪类药物(45.9%比 39.9%)相比,起始使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的患者血压控制率更高。与 FEC 相比,起始使用 FDC 的患者血压降低幅度更大(SBP 降低 17.3 比 12.0mmHg;DBP 降低 10.1 比 6.0mmHg),与单药治疗相比(SBP 降低 17.3 比 13.6mmHg;DBP 降低 10.1 比 7.9mmHg)。FDC 组达到 JNC7 目标的比例也高于 FEC 组(57.2%比 42.5%)和 FDC 组与单药治疗组(57.2%比 44.9%)。
起始使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂的患者血压控制率略高。与单药治疗或 FEC 相比,起始使用 FDC 作为初始治疗更能有效控制高血压。