• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Uncertainty in MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates estimated from T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.从T1加权动态对比增强磁共振成像估计的磁共振示踪剂动力学参数和水交换率的不确定性。
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Aug;72(2):534-45. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24927. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
2
Improved accuracy and precision of tracer kinetic parameters by joint fitting to variable flip angle and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data.通过联合拟合可变翻转角和动态对比增强磁共振成像数据提高示踪剂动力学参数的准确性和精确性。
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Oct;76(4):1270-81. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26013. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?定量动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参数的准确性和精确性:应如何估计对比剂浓度?
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;52:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 16.
4
Estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using two flip angles.使用两个翻转角估算动态对比增强 MRI 中的细胞间质水交换。
NMR Biomed. 2019 Nov;32(11):e4135. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4135. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
Cellular-interstitial water exchange and its effect on the determination of contrast agent concentration in vivo: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of human internal obturator muscle.细胞-间质水交换及其对体内造影剂浓度测定的影响:人体闭孔内肌的动态对比增强磁共振成像
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Nov;60(5):1011-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21748.
6
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data.动态对比增强磁共振成像:使用模拟数据和临床数据研究软件间的准确性和可重复性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jun;43(6):1288-300. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25101. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Simultaneous measurement of T /B and pharmacokinetic model parameters using active contrast encoding (ACE)-MRI.使用主动对比编码(ACE)磁共振成像同时测量T/B和药代动力学模型参数。
NMR Biomed. 2017 Sep;30(9). doi: 10.1002/nbm.3737. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Cluster analysis of DCE-MRI data identifies regional tracer-kinetic changes after tumor treatment with high intensity focused ultrasound.DCE-MRI数据的聚类分析确定了高强度聚焦超声治疗肿瘤后区域示踪剂动力学变化。
NMR Biomed. 2015 Nov;28(11):1443-54. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3406. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
9
Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography.饱和恢复动态对比增强磁共振成像采集协议的优化:钆喷酸葡胺磁共振肾造影的蒙特卡罗模拟方法
NMR Biomed. 2016 Jul;29(7):969-77. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3553. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in mice: an investigation of model parameter uncertainties.小鼠动态对比增强磁共振成像:模型参数不确定性研究
Magn Reson Med. 2015 May;73(5):1979-87. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25319. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive characterization of tumor therapeutic response with simultaneous mapping cell size, density, and transcytolemmal water exchange.通过同时绘制细胞大小、密度和跨细胞膜水交换来全面表征肿瘤治疗反应。
ArXiv. 2024 Aug 4:arXiv:2408.01918v1.
2
Impact of Arterial Input Function and Pharmacokinetic Models on DCE-MRI Biomarkers for Detection of Vascular Effect Induced by Stroma-Directed Drug in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer.动脉输入函数和药代动力学模型对在胰腺癌原位小鼠模型中检测基质导向药物诱导的血管效应的DCE-MRI生物标志物的影响。
Mol Imaging Biol. 2023 Aug;25(4):638-647. doi: 10.1007/s11307-023-01824-7. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
Evaluation of cellular water exchange in a mouse glioma model using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with two flip angles.使用具有两个翻转角的动态对比增强 MRI 评估小鼠脑胶质瘤模型中的细胞水交换。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 21;13(1):3007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29991-1.
4
Measurement of cellular-interstitial water exchange time in tumors based on diffusion-time-dependent diffusional kurtosis imaging.基于扩散时间依赖的扩散峰度成像测量肿瘤细胞间质水交换时间。
NMR Biomed. 2021 Jun;34(6):e4496. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4496. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
5
Advances in Diffusion and Perfusion MRI for Quantitative Cancer Imaging.用于定量癌症成像的扩散与灌注磁共振成像进展
Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2019 Dec;7(4):129-141. doi: 10.1007/s40139-019-00204-7. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
6
Estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using two flip angles.使用两个翻转角估算动态对比增强 MRI 中的细胞间质水交换。
NMR Biomed. 2019 Nov;32(11):e4135. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4135. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?定量动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参数的准确性和精确性:应如何估计对比剂浓度?
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;52:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
Simultaneous measurement of T /B and pharmacokinetic model parameters using active contrast encoding (ACE)-MRI.使用主动对比编码(ACE)磁共振成像同时测量T/B和药代动力学模型参数。
NMR Biomed. 2017 Sep;30(9). doi: 10.1002/nbm.3737. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Pulsed and oscillating gradient MRI for assessment of cell size and extracellular space (POMACE) in mouse gliomas.用于评估小鼠胶质瘤细胞大小和细胞外间隙的脉冲与振荡梯度磁共振成像(POMACE)
NMR Biomed. 2016 Oct;29(10):1350-63. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3577. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
10
Water-Exchange-Modified Kinetic Parameters from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI as Prognostic Biomarkers of Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Antiangiogenic Monotherapy.动态对比增强磁共振成像中经水交换修正的动力学参数作为抗血管生成单药治疗晚期肝细胞癌生存预后生物标志物
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0136725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136725. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Cell membrane water exchange effects in prostate DCE-MRI.前列腺 DCE-MRI 中的细胞膜水交换效应。
J Magn Reson. 2012 May;218:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Temporal resolution and SNR requirements for accurate DCE-MRI data analysis using the AATH model.使用 AATH 模型进行准确的 DCE-MRI 数据分析的时间分辨率和 SNR 要求。
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Dec;64(6):1772-80. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22573. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
3
Prediction of response to chemoradiation therapy in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.利用动态对比增强磁共振成像预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌的放化疗反应。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Feb;31(2):262-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1817. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
4
Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.使用T1加权动态对比增强磁共振成像对肺部造影剂动力学进行建模。
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jun;61(6):1507-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21814.
5
Detection of apoptotic cell death in vitro in the presence of Gd-DTPA-BMA.在钆喷酸葡胺-丁二酸单甲酯(Gd-DTPA-BMA)存在的情况下体外检测凋亡细胞死亡。
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jul;62(1):46-55. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21972.
6
Dynamic NMR effects in breast cancer dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI.乳腺癌动态对比增强磁共振成像中的动态核磁共振效应
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17937-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804224105. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
7
The magnetic resonance shutter speed discriminates vascular properties of malignant and benign breast tumors in vivo.磁共振快门速度可在体内区分恶性和良性乳腺肿瘤的血管特性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17943-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711226105. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
8
Cellular-interstitial water exchange and its effect on the determination of contrast agent concentration in vivo: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of human internal obturator muscle.细胞-间质水交换及其对体内造影剂浓度测定的影响:人体闭孔内肌的动态对比增强磁共振成像
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Nov;60(5):1011-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21748.
9
Model-based and model-free parametric analysis of breast dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI.基于模型和无模型的乳腺动态对比增强磁共振成像参数分析
NMR Biomed. 2009 Jan;22(1):40-53. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1221.
10
Transcytolemmal water exchange in pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.头颈部鳞状细胞癌动态对比增强MRI数据药代动力学分析中的跨细胞膜水交换
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;26(6):1607-17. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21207.

从T1加权动态对比增强磁共振成像估计的磁共振示踪剂动力学参数和水交换率的不确定性。

Uncertainty in MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates estimated from T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

作者信息

Zhang Jin, Kim Sungheon

机构信息

Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, USA.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2014 Aug;72(2):534-45. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24927. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.24927
PMID:24006341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3942367/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the uncertainty in estimation of MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates in T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.

METHODS

Simulated DCE-MRI data were used to assess four kinetic models; general kinetic model with a vascular compartment (GKM2), GKM2 combined with water exchange (SSM2), adiabatic approximation of the tissue homogeneity model (ATH), and ATH combined with water exchange (ATHX).

RESULTS

In GKM2 and SSM2, increase in transfer constant (K(trans)) led to underestimation of vascular volume fraction (vb), and increase in vb led to overestimation of K(trans). Such coupling between K(trans) and vb was not observed in ATH and ATHX. The precision of estimated intracellular water lifetime (τi) was substantially improved in both SSM2 and ATHX when K(trans) > 0.3 min(-1). K(trans) and vb from ATHX model had significantly smaller errors than those from ATH model (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrated the feasibility of measuring τi from DCE-MRI data albeit low precision. While the inclusion of water exchange improved the accuracy of K(trans), vb, and the interstitial volume fraction estimation (ve), it lowered the precision of other kinetic model parameters within the conditions investigated in this study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估T1加权动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像中磁共振示踪剂动力学参数和水交换率估计的不确定性。

方法

使用模拟的DCE-MRI数据评估四种动力学模型;具有血管腔室的一般动力学模型(GKM2)、结合水交换的GKM2(SSM2)、组织均匀性模型的绝热近似(ATH)以及结合水交换的ATH(ATHX)。

结果

在GKM2和SSM2中,转运常数(K(trans))增加导致血管容积分数(vb)估计值偏低,而vb增加导致K(trans)估计值偏高。在ATH和ATHX中未观察到K(trans)与vb之间的这种耦合。当K(trans)>0.3 min⁻¹时,SSM2和ATHX中估计的细胞内水寿命(τi)的精度均有显著提高。ATHX模型的K(trans)和vb的误差明显小于ATH模型(P<0.05)。

结论

本研究结果证明了从DCE-MRI数据测量τi的可行性,尽管精度较低。虽然纳入水交换提高了K(trans)、vb和间质容积分数(ve)估计的准确性,但在本研究调查的条件下,它降低了其他动力学模型参数的精度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/a206aad52c3b/nihms546321f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/015ac69c407d/nihms546321f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/17b81fad890a/nihms546321f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/f9145651d80d/nihms546321f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/f20a0e0e9a6c/nihms546321f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/8d4b3af371bb/nihms546321f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/a206aad52c3b/nihms546321f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/015ac69c407d/nihms546321f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/17b81fad890a/nihms546321f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/f9145651d80d/nihms546321f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/f20a0e0e9a6c/nihms546321f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/8d4b3af371bb/nihms546321f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/3942367/a206aad52c3b/nihms546321f6.jpg