Li Jianghong, Johnson Sarah E, Han Wen-Jui, Andrews Sonia, Kendall Garth, Strazdins Lyndall, Dockery Alfred
Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia,
J Prim Prev. 2014 Feb;35(1):53-73. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0318-z.
This paper provides a comprehensive review of empirical evidence linking parental nonstandard work schedules to four main child developmental outcomes: internalizing and externalizing problems, cognitive development, and body mass index. We evaluated the studies based on theory and methodological rigor (longitudinal data, representative samples, consideration of selection and information bias, confounders, moderators, and mediators). Of 23 studies published between 1980 and 2012 that met the selection criteria, 21 reported significant associations between nonstandard work schedules and an adverse child developmental outcome. The associations were partially mediated through parental depressive symptoms, low quality parenting, reduced parent-child interaction and closeness, and a less supportive home environment. These associations were more pronounced in disadvantaged families and when parents worked such schedules full time. We discuss the nuance, strengths, and limitations of the existing studies, and propose recommendations for future research.
内化和外化问题、认知发展以及体重指数。我们基于理论和方法的严谨性（纵向数据、代表性样本、对选择和信息偏差、混杂因素、调节因素和中介因素的考虑）对这些研究进行了评估。在1980年至2012年间发表的符合选择标准的23项研究中，有21项报告了非标准工作时间表与不良儿童发展结果之间存在显著关联。这些关联部分是通过父母的抑郁症状、低质量的养育方式、亲子互动和亲密程度的降低以及支持性较低的家庭环境介导的。这些关联在弱势家庭以及父母全职从事此类工作时间表时更为明显。我们讨论了现有研究的细微差别、优势和局限性，并为未来研究提出了建议。
