Suppr超能文献

心理生理反应、主观困扰及其与 PTSD 诊断的关系。

Psychophysiologic reactivity, subjective distress, and their associations with PTSD diagnosis.

机构信息

National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Aug;122(3):635-44. doi: 10.1037/a0033942.

Abstract

Intense subjective distress and physiologic reactivity upon exposure to reminders of the traumatic event are each diagnostic features of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, subjective reports and psychophysiological data often suggest different conclusions. For the present study, we combined data from five previous studies to assess the contributions of these two types of measures in predicting PTSD diagnosis. One hundred fifty trauma-exposed participants who were classified into PTSD or non-PTSD groups based on structured diagnostic interviews completed the same script-driven imagery procedure, which quantified measures of psychophysiologic reactivity and self-reported emotional responses. We derived four discriminant functions (DiscFxs) that each maximally separated the PTSD from the non-PTSD group using (1) psychophysiologic measures recorded during personal mental imagery of the traumatic event; (2) self-report ratings in response to the trauma imagery; (3) psychophysiologic measures recorded during personal mental imagery of another highly stressful experience unrelated to the index traumatic event; and (4) self-report ratings in response to this other stressor. When PTSD status was simultaneously regressed on all four DiscFxs, trauma-related psychophysiological reactivity was a significant predictor, but physiological reactivity resulting from the highly stressful, but not traumatic script, was not. Self-reported distress to the traumatic experience and the other stressful event were both predictive of PTSD diagnosis. Trauma-related psychophysiologic reactivity was the best predictor of PTSD diagnosis, but self-reported distress contributed additional variance. These results are discussed in relation to the Research Domain Criteria framework.

摘要

强烈的主观痛苦和创伤事件提醒下的生理反应性是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断特征。然而,主观报告和心理生理学数据通常表明不同的结论。在本研究中,我们结合了五项先前研究的数据,以评估这两种类型的测量在预测 PTSD 诊断中的贡献。150 名创伤暴露参与者根据结构诊断访谈被分为 PTSD 或非 PTSD 组,他们完成了相同的脚本驱动意象程序,该程序量化了心理生理学反应和自我报告的情绪反应的测量。我们得出了四个判别函数(DiscFxs),每个函数都通过以下方式最大限度地将 PTSD 与非 PTSD 组分开:(1)个人对创伤事件的心理意象过程中记录的心理生理学测量;(2)对创伤意象的自我报告评分;(3)个人对与索引创伤事件无关的另一个高度应激体验的心理意象过程中记录的心理生理学测量;(4)对这个其他应激源的自我报告评分。当 PTSD 状态同时回归到所有四个 DiscFxs 时,与创伤相关的生理反应性是一个重要的预测因素,但与高度应激但非创伤性脚本相关的生理反应性则不是。对创伤经历和其他应激事件的自我报告痛苦都是 PTSD 诊断的预测因素。与创伤相关的心理生理学反应是 PTSD 诊断的最佳预测因素,但自我报告的痛苦也增加了差异。这些结果在与研究领域标准框架有关的情况下进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验