Ballesteros-Gómez Ana, de Boer Jacob, Leonards Pim E G
Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University , De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anal Chem. 2013 Oct 15;85(20):9572-80. doi: 10.1021/ac4017314. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
In this study, we assess the applicability of different analytical techniques, namely, direct probe (DP), gas chromatography (GC), and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) with a high resolution (HR)-time-of-flight (TOF)-mass spectrometry (MS) for the analysis of flame retardants and plasticizers in electronic waste and car interiors. APCI-HRTOFMS is a combination scarcely exploited yet with GC or with a direct probe for screening purposes and to the best of our knowledge, never with GC × GC to provide comprehensive information. Because of the increasing number of flame retardants and questions about their environmental fate, there is a need for the development of wider target and untargeted screening techniques to assess human exposure to these compounds. With the use of the APCI source, we took the advantage of using a soft ionization technique that provides mainly molecular ions, in addition to the accuracy of HRMS for identification. The direct probe provided a very easy and inexpensive method for the identification of flame retardants without any sample preparation. This technique seems extremely useful for the screening of solid materials such as electrical devices, electronics and other waste. GC-APCI-HRTOF-MS appeared to be more sensitive compared to liquid chromatography (LC)-APCI/atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI)-HRTOF-MS for a wider range of flame retardants with absolute detection limits in the range of 0.5-25 pg. A variety of tri- to decabromodiphenyl ethers, phosphorus flame retardants and new flame retardants were found in the samples at levels from microgram per gram to milligram per gram levels.
在本研究中,我们评估了不同分析技术的适用性,即直接探头(DP)、气相色谱(GC)以及与大气压化学电离(APCI)联用的全二维气相色谱(GC×GC)结合高分辨率(HR)-飞行时间(TOF)-质谱(MS),用于分析电子废物和汽车内饰中的阻燃剂和增塑剂。APCI-HRTOFMS这种组合在用于筛选目的时,与GC或直接探头联用的情况很少,据我们所知,从未与GC×GC联用以提供全面信息。由于阻燃剂的数量不断增加以及对其环境归宿的疑问,需要开发更广泛的目标和非目标筛选技术来评估人类对这些化合物的接触情况。通过使用APCI源,我们利用了一种软电离技术的优势,该技术除了提供HRMS用于鉴定的准确性外,还主要提供分子离子。直接探头提供了一种非常简便且廉价的方法来鉴定阻燃剂,无需任何样品制备。该技术对于筛选诸如电气设备、电子产品及其他废物等固体材料似乎极为有用。与液相色谱(LC)-APCI/大气压光电离(APPI)-HRTOF-MS相比,GC-APCI-HRTOF-MS对于更广泛的阻燃剂似乎更灵敏,其绝对检测限在0.5 - 25 pg范围内。在样品中发现了各种三溴至十溴二苯醚、磷系阻燃剂和新型阻燃剂,含量从每克微克级到每克毫克级不等。