Lampropoulou Sofia I, Nowicky Alexander V
Physiotherapy Dept., Higher Technological Educational Institute of Patras, West Greece, Aigio, Greece.
Motor Control. 2013 Oct;17(4):412-26. doi: 10.1123/mcj.17.4.412. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
The purported ergogenic actions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to motor cortex (M1) on force production and perception of effort were investigated using a 10-item numerical rating scale (0-10 NRS) in nonfatiguing bouts of a force-matching task utilizing isometric elbow flexion. Using a crossover design, 12 healthy volunteers received sham, anodal, and cathodal tDCS randomly for 10 min (1.5 mA, 62 μA/cm2) to the left M1 in a double-blind manner. Corticospinal excitability changes were also monitored using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with surface electromyography (sEMG) to monitor both motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and force-EMG from right m. biceps brachii and m. brachioradialis brachii. No significant differences between the verum and sham stimulation were obtained for elbow flexion maximum voluntary force, perception of effort, or sEMG. There were also no significant differences in MEP changes for the types of tDCS, which is consistent with reports that tDCS excitability effects are diminished during ongoing cognitive and motor activities.
采用10项数字评分量表(0 - 10 NRS),在等长屈肘的非疲劳性力量匹配任务中,研究经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作用于运动皮层(M1)对力量产生和用力感知的所谓促力作用。采用交叉设计,12名健康志愿者以双盲方式随机接受假刺激、阳极tDCS和阴极tDCS,对左侧M1进行10分钟刺激(1.5 mA,62 μA/cm²)。还使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)结合表面肌电图(sEMG)来监测皮质脊髓兴奋性变化,以监测右侧肱二头肌和肱桡肌的运动诱发电位(MEP)和力量肌电图。在屈肘最大自主力量、用力感知或sEMG方面,真刺激和假刺激之间未获得显著差异。tDCS类型在MEP变化方面也没有显著差异,这与在进行认知和运动活动期间tDCS兴奋性效应减弱的报道一致。