Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:348. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-348.
Urgent referral for suspected cancer was implemented in Denmark on 1 April 2008 to reduce the secondary care interval (i.e. the time interval from the general practitioner's first referral of a patient to secondary health care until treatment is initiated). However, knowledge about the association between the secondary care interval and urgent referral remains scarce. The aim of this study was to analyse how the secondary care interval changed after the introduction of urgent referral.
This was a retrospective population-based study of 6,518 incident cancer patients based on questionnaire data from the patients' GPs. Analyses were stratified with patients discharged from Vejle Hospital in one stratum and patients from other hospitals in another because Vejle Hospital initiated urgent referrals several years prior to the national implementation. Further, analyses were stratified according to symptom presentation and whether or not the GP referred the patient on suspicion of cancer. Symptom presentation was defined as with or without alarm symptoms based on GP interpretation of early symptoms.
The median secondary care interval decreased after the introduction of urgent referral. Patients discharged from Vejle Hospital tended to have shorter secondary care intervals than patients discharged from other hospitals. The strongest effect was seen in patients with alarm symptoms and those who were referred by their GP on suspicion of cancer. Breast cancer patients from Vejle Hospital experienced an even shorter secondary care interval after the national introduction of urgent referrals.
Urgent referral had a positive effect on the secondary care interval, and Vejle Hospital remarkably managed to shorten the intervals even further. This finding indicates that the shorter secondary care intervals not only result from the urgent referral guidelines, but also involve other factors.
丹麦于 2008 年 4 月 1 日实施了癌症疑似患者的紧急转诊制度,以缩短二级医疗保健的间隔时间(即从全科医生首次转诊患者到二级保健机构,直到开始治疗的时间间隔)。然而,对于二级保健间隔时间与紧急转诊之间的关联,人们的了解仍然很少。本研究的目的是分析在引入紧急转诊后二级保健间隔时间的变化。
这是一项基于患者全科医生问卷数据的回顾性基于人群的研究,共纳入了 6518 例新发癌症患者。分析分为两层,一层是在维勒勒医院出院的患者,另一层是在其他医院出院的患者,因为维勒勒医院在全国实施紧急转诊前几年就开始了紧急转诊。此外,分析还根据症状表现和全科医生是否怀疑癌症转诊进行分层。症状表现根据全科医生对早期症状的解释定义为是否有报警症状。
引入紧急转诊后,二级医疗保健间隔时间缩短。与其他医院出院的患者相比,在维勒勒医院出院的患者二级医疗保健间隔时间更短。在有报警症状和全科医生怀疑癌症转诊的患者中,效果最强。在维勒勒医院出院的乳腺癌患者在全国实施紧急转诊后,二级医疗保健间隔时间甚至更短。
紧急转诊对二级医疗保健间隔时间有积极影响,维勒勒医院显著进一步缩短了间隔时间。这一发现表明,较短的二级保健间隔时间不仅是由于紧急转诊指南,还涉及其他因素。