Windus D W, Audrain J, Vanderson R, Jendrisak M D, Picus D, Delmez J A
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Kidney Int. 1990 Aug;38(2):337-41. doi: 10.1038/ki.1990.206.
Recirculation studies were performed in 103 patients treated with high-efficiency dialysis over a 14 month period. Fistulograms were performed on 22 out of 25 patients with greater than 0.15 fractional recirculation at a 400 ml/minute blood pump setting. Clinically significant abnormalities were found in 82% (N = 18) and treated in 17. Two patients had second episodes of elevated recirculations and were treated again within the period of follow-up. Treatment with angioplasty (N = 11) or surgical revision (N = 8) resulted in a fall in recirculation from 0.33 +/- 0.04 to 0.12 +/- 0.02 (P = 0.001). The fractional reduction of urea clearance due to recirculation fell from 0.20 +/- 0.03 to 0.08 +/- 0.02 (P = 0.001) and the effective urea clearance of the dialysis treatment rose by 16% from 193 +/- 7 ml/min to 224 +/- 6 ml/min (P = 0.001). Pre-dialysis BUN fell from 72 +/- 4 mg/100 ml to 62 +/- 3 mg/100 ml (P = 0.012). There was no correlation between venous pressure (VP) at 400 ml/min blood pump setting and recirculation (R2 = 0.04), although VP changed significantly comparing values before and after fistula repair (211 +/- 10 vs. 186 +/- 7 mm Hg, P = 0.012). Venous pressures in 20 of the patients in our dialysis unit with recirculations of less than 0.10 were 201 +/- 6 mm Hg (P = NS compared to patients with recirculation greater than or equal to 0.15 at 400 ml/min blood flow).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在14个月期间,对103例接受高效透析治疗的患者进行了再循环研究。在25例血液泵流速设定为400 ml/分钟时,分流率大于0.15的患者中,有22例进行了动静脉内瘘造影。82%(n = 18)的患者发现了具有临床意义的异常,其中17例接受了治疗。2例患者出现了再循环升高的复发情况,并在随访期间再次接受治疗。血管成形术治疗(n = 11)或手术修复(n = 8)使再循环率从0.33±0.04降至0.12±0.02(P = 0.001)。由于再循环导致的尿素清除率分数降低从0.20±0.03降至0.08±0.02(P = 0.001),透析治疗的有效尿素清除率从193±7 ml/分钟提高了16%,至224±6 ml/分钟(P = 0.001)。透析前血尿素氮从72±4 mg/100 ml降至62±3 mg/100 ml(P = 0.012)。尽管在动静脉内瘘修复前后,静脉压(VP)值有显著变化(211±10 vs. 186±7 mmHg,P = 0.012),但在血液泵流速设定为400 ml/分钟时,静脉压与再循环之间无相关性(R2 = 0.04)。在我们透析单元中,20例再循环率低于0.10的患者的静脉压为201±6 mmHg(与血液流速为400 ml/分钟时,再循环率大于或等于0.15的患者相比,P = 无显著性差异)。(摘要截断于250字)