Reinier Postlaan 12, 6525 GC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;74(8):821-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08321.
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of electroencephalographic (EEG) neurofeedback in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The study started in August 2008 and ended in July 2012 and was conducted at Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Centre in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Forty-one children (aged 8-15 years) with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD were randomly assigned to treatment with either EEG neurofeedback (n = 22) or placebo neurofeedback (n = 19) for 30 sessions, given as 2 sessions per week. The children were stratified by age, electrophysiologic state of arousal, and medication use. Everyone involved in the study, except the neurofeedback therapist and the principal investigator, was blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was severity of ADHD symptoms on the ADHD Rating Scale IV, scored at baseline, during treatment, and at study end. Clinical improvement as measured by the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) was a secondary outcome.
While total ADHD symptoms improved over time in both groups (F1,39 = 26.56, P < .001), there was no significant treatment effect, ie, group × time interaction (F1,39 = 0.36, P = .554); the same was true for clinical improvement as measured by the CGI-I (P = .092). No clinically relevant side effects were observed. Among the children and their parents, guessing treatment assignment was not better than chance level (P = .224 for children, P = .643 for parents).
EEG neurofeedback was not superior to placebo neurofeedback in improving ADHD symptoms in children with ADHD.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00723684.
本研究采用双盲、随机、安慰剂对照设计,旨在评估脑电生物反馈治疗儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的疗效和安全性。该研究于 2008 年 8 月启动,2012 年 7 月结束,在荷兰奈梅亨 Karakter 儿童和青少年精神病学大学中心进行。
41 名符合 DSM-IV-TR 诊断标准的 ADHD 患儿(年龄 8-15 岁)被随机分为脑电生物反馈治疗组(n=22)和安慰剂脑电生物反馈治疗组(n=19),两组患儿均接受 30 次治疗,每周 2 次。根据年龄、觉醒状态的脑电图和药物使用情况进行分层。除脑电生物反馈治疗师和主要研究者外,所有参与研究的人员均对治疗分组情况设盲。主要结局指标为 ADHD 症状严重程度,采用 ADHD 评定量表第四版(ADHD Rating Scale IV)进行评估,评估时间包括基线时、治疗期间和研究结束时。临床总体印象-改善量表(Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale,CGI-I)评估的临床改善程度为次要结局指标。
两组 ADHD 症状评分均随时间推移逐渐改善(F1,39 = 26.56,P <.001),但无显著的治疗效果,即组间×时间交互作用(F1,39 = 0.36,P =.554);CGI-I 评估的临床改善程度也相同(P =.092)。未观察到明显的不良反应。患儿和其父母猜测治疗分组的准确性与随机猜测水平相当(患儿:P =.224,父母:P =.643)。
与安慰剂脑电生物反馈相比,脑电生物反馈对改善 ADHD 患儿的 ADHD 症状并无优势。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00723684。