Suppr超能文献

技能还是思维?健康素养、患者激活与健康之间的关联。

Skill set or mind set? Associations between health literacy, patient activation and health.

机构信息

Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e74373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074373. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is ongoing debate on whether health literacy represents a skill-based construct for health self-management, or if it also more broadly captures personal 'activation' or motivation to manage health. This research examines 1) the association between patient activation and health literacy as they are most commonly measured and 2) the independent and combined associations of patient activation and health literacy skills with physical and mental health.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of baseline cross-sectional data from the LitCog cohort of older adults was used. Participants (n = 697) were recruited from multiple US-based health centers. During structured face-to-face interviews, participants completed the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), the SF-36 physical health summary subscale, and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Service (PROMIS) short form subscales for depression and anxiety.

RESULTS

The relationship between health literacy and patient activation was weak, but significant (r = 0.11, p<0.01). In models adjusted for participant characteristics, lower health literacy was associated with worse physical health (β = 0.13, p<0.001) and depression (β = -0.16, p<0.001). Lower patient activation was associated with worse physical health (β = 0.19, p<0.001), depression (β = -0.27, p<0.001) and anxiety (β-0.24, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common measures of health literacy and patient activation are weakly correlated with each other, but also independently correlated with health outcomes. This suggests health literacy represents a distinct skill-based construct, supporting the Institute of Medicine's definition. Deficits in either construct could be useful targets for behavioral intervention.

摘要

目的

健康素养是否代表健康自我管理的技能基础结构,或者它是否更广泛地捕捉个人“激活”或管理健康的动机,这一直存在争议。本研究检验了 1)最常测量的患者激活和健康素养之间的关联,以及 2)患者激活和健康素养技能与身心健康的独立和综合关联。

方法

使用来自老年人群体 LitCog 队列的基线横断面数据进行二次分析。参与者(n=697)从美国多个健康中心招募。在结构化的面对面访谈中,参与者完成了成人功能性健康素养测试(TOFHLA)、患者激活量表(PAM)、SF-36 身体健康综合量表和患者报告的结果测量信息服务(PROMIS)简短形式子量表,用于评估抑郁和焦虑。

结果

健康素养和患者激活之间的关系虽然较弱,但具有统计学意义(r=0.11,p<0.01)。在调整参与者特征的模型中,较低的健康素养与较差的身体健康(β=0.13,p<0.001)和抑郁(β=-0.16,p<0.001)相关。较低的患者激活与较差的身体健康(β=0.19,p<0.001)、抑郁(β=-0.27,p<0.001)和焦虑(β=-0.24,p<0.001)相关。

结论

最常用的健康素养和患者激活测量方法彼此之间相关性较弱,但也与健康结果独立相关。这表明健康素养代表一种独特的技能基础结构,支持医学研究所的定义。这两种结构的缺陷都可能成为行为干预的有用目标。

相似文献

3
Literacy, cognitive function, and health: results of the LitCog study.读写能力、认知功能与健康:LitCog 研究结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1300-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2079-4. Epub 2012 May 8.

引用本文的文献

3
A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.《基于价值的专科护理外科医生指南》
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Aug 25;10(4):e70239. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70239. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Development and evaluation of the patient engagement questionnaire (PEQ).患者参与度问卷(PEQ)的开发与评估。
PEC Innov. 2025 Apr 14;6:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100392. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

3
Literacy, cognitive function, and health: results of the LitCog study.读写能力、认知功能与健康:LitCog 研究结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1300-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2079-4. Epub 2012 May 8.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验