Suppr超能文献

在快速证据审查中应用PAPERS分级标准以确定患者赋权工具的心理测量和实用特性。

Application of the PAPERS Grading Criteria Within a Rapid Evidence Review to Determine the Psychometric and Pragmatic Properties of Patient Empowerment Tools.

作者信息

Woolley Katherine E, Jones Nia J, Rahim Ayesha, Withers Kathleen L, Letchford Robert

机构信息

CEDAR, Centre for Healthcare Evaluation, Device Assessment and Research, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff Medicentre, Cardiff, UK.

Welsh Value in Health Centre, DDTIV Directorate, NHS Executive, Llantrisant, UK.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2024 Aug 21;11:23743735241272191. doi: 10.1177/23743735241272191. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Self-management of long-term conditions requires health professionals to understand and develop capabilities that empower the population they serve. A rapid evidence review was undertaken to assess the current evidence based on the psychometric properties of patient empowerment tools. MEDLINE was searched, and data were extracted for each publication and scored using a modified Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS) evidence rating scale. The results were grouped into the following domains: (a) health literacy; (b) patient activation; (c) long-term conditions; (d) self-management needs and behaviors. A full-text review of 65 publications led to the inclusion of 29 primary studies. The highest scoring tools were selected with respect to performance for each domain: (a) Newest Vital Sign and the Brief Health Literacy Screen; (b) Consumer Health Activation Index and PAM-13; (c) LTCQ and LTCQ8; and (d) SEMCD and Patient Enablement Instrument. PAPERS was a useful tool in determining the generalizability, validity, and reliability of these patient empowerment tools. However, further research is required to establish whether an individual's health literacy status influences patient empowerment tool outcomes.

摘要

长期疾病的自我管理要求卫生专业人员理解并培养相应能力,以便增强他们所服务人群的能力。我们进行了一项快速证据审查,以根据患者赋权工具的心理测量特性评估当前证据。检索了MEDLINE数据库,并从每篇出版物中提取数据,使用改良的心理测量和实用证据评级量表(PAPERS)证据评级量表进行评分。结果分为以下几个领域:(a)健康素养;(b)患者激活;(c)长期疾病;(d)自我管理需求和行为。对65篇出版物进行全文审查后纳入了29项主要研究。针对每个领域的表现选出了得分最高的工具:(a)最新生命体征和简短健康素养筛查;(b)消费者健康激活指数和PAM-13;(c)LTCQ和LTCQ8;(d)SEMCD和患者赋能工具。PAPERS是确定这些患者赋权工具的普遍性、有效性和可靠性的有用工具。然而,需要进一步研究以确定个人的健康素养状况是否会影响患者赋权工具的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18f5/11339745/b1a18a77d9f9/10.1177_23743735241272191-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验