Zhu Yi, Hu Cheng-Fang, Yang Guang, Cheng Dong, Luo Cong-Feng
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 600 YiShan Road, Shanghai 200233, China.
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2013 Sep 11;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-7-7.
The purpose of our study was to evaluate inter-observer reliability of the Three-Column classifications with conventional Schatzker and AO/OTA of Tibial Plateau Fractures.
50 cases involving all kinds of the fracture patterns were collected from 278 consecutive patients with tibial plateau fractures who were internal fixed in department of Orthopedics and Trauma III in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital. The series were arranged randomly, numbered 1 to 50. Four observers were chosen to classify these cases. Before the research, a classification training session was held to each observer. They were given as much time as they required evaluating the radiographs accurately and independently. The classification choices made at the first viewing were not available during the second viewing. The observers were not provided with any feedback after the first viewing. The kappa statistic was used to analyze the inter-observer reliability of the three fracture classification made by the four observers.
The mean kappa values for inter-observer reliability regarding Schatzker classification was 0.567 (range: 0.513-0.589), representing "moderate agreement". The mean kappa values for inter-observer reliability regarding AO/ASIF classification systems was 0.623 (range: 0.510-0.710) representing "substantial agreement". The mean kappa values for inter-observer reliability regarding Three-Column classification systems was 0.766 (range: 0.706-0.890), representing "substantial agreement".
Three-Column classification, which is dependent on the understanding of the fractures using CT scans as well as the 3D reconstruction can identity the posterior column fracture or fragment. It showed "substantial agreement" in the assessment of inter-observer reliability, higher than the conventional Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications. We finally conclude that Three-Column classification provides a higher agreement among different surgeons and could be popularized and widely practiced in other clinical centers.
本研究旨在评估采用传统的Schatzker分类法和AO/OTA三柱分类法对胫骨平台骨折进行观察者间可靠性评估。
从上海第六人民医院骨科与创伤三科接受内固定治疗的278例连续胫骨平台骨折患者中收集50例涉及各种骨折类型的病例。将这些病例随机排列,编号为1至50。选择四名观察者对这些病例进行分类。在研究前,为每位观察者举办了一次分类培训课程。给予他们足够的时间以准确、独立地评估X线片。第一次观察时做出的分类选择在第二次观察时不可见。第一次观察后未向观察者提供任何反馈。使用kappa统计量分析四名观察者对三种骨折分类法的观察者间可靠性。
Schatzker分类法的观察者间可靠性平均kappa值为0.567(范围:0.513 - 0.589),表示“中度一致”。AO/ASIF分类系统的观察者间可靠性平均kappa值为0.623(范围:0.510 - 0.710),表示“高度一致”。三柱分类系统的观察者间可靠性平均kappa值为0.766(范围:0.706 - 0.890),表示“高度一致”。
三柱分类法依赖于使用CT扫描及三维重建对骨折的理解,能够识别后柱骨折或骨块。在观察者间可靠性评估中显示出“高度一致”,高于传统的Schatzker和AO/OTA分类法。我们最终得出结论,三柱分类法在不同外科医生之间具有更高的一致性,可在其他临床中心推广并广泛应用。